![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2019
Location: NY
Posts: 143
|
Comparing the 15202 to 26240
Hi All
Looking for my next piece, and considering either a 15202 or 26240. I am a big fan of the chrono as it is more of a "do everything" watch. The problem is they are hard to find/try on and I am going grey. The 15202 I tried on several times, I do like it, but seems a bit delicate/dressy compared to the sporty chrono which I am leaning towards at the moment since I already have a dressy watch. I have a pretty small wrist, right under 6.5" so this decision is not easy! When researching 15202 vs 15500 a youtube video was very helpful that mentioned that the "wingspan" of the 15202 is very similar to the 15500, and when I tried on a 15500 it honestly did not feel that different on the wrist, I just felt the dial was humongous and empty.... so my next thought is to go to a busy chronograph which to me seems to have a smaller dial. I also chose the 26240 over the 26331 as it has a slimmer bracelet. Any help is greatly appreciated! |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 2 (0 members and 2 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.