ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

TheVTCGuy · 17 May 2011, 02:58 PM

Ok, we can all blame Otto for starting this rumor... (the Bastid!

) And Bill (Speedy) is probably right that it's a bunch of

But let's look at it with an open mind.

The 42 MM suprised everyone at Basil, Rolex already had a 40MM EXP II, AND a 39, yet they come out with a new size. Rolex already has a 40MM GMT, why is it so far-fetched to believe they would release a 42? The Old EX II and GMT shared the same movement, the 3186, they can also share the 3187 if a 42 MM GMT is released. And can't the GMT and EXP II use the same case? Isn't the only difference the (rotating) bezel?

Granted, I don't know about the AG and TT models.... But is it really such a stretch to think they couldn't come out with a 42 GMT?

17 May 2011, 02:58 PM	#1
TheVTCGuy Banned Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Paul Location: San Diego Watch: 126619LB Posts: 21,540	42MM GMT, Is it really so far-fetched? Ok, we can all blame Otto for starting this rumor... (the Bastid! ) And Bill (Speedy) is probably right that it's a bunch of But let's look at it with an open mind. The 42 MM suprised everyone at Basil, Rolex already had a 40MM EXP II, AND a 39, yet they come out with a new size. Rolex already has a 40MM GMT, why is it so far-fetched to believe they would release a 42? The Old EX II and GMT shared the same movement, the 3186, they can also share the 3187 if a 42 MM GMT is released. And can't the GMT and EXP II use the same case? Isn't the only difference the (rotating) bezel? Granted, I don't know about the AG and TT models.... But is it really such a stretch to think they couldn't come out with a 42 GMT?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)