![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
View Poll Results: Now that some time has passed, what are your thoughts on the 507? | |||
I've warmed up to the 507 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
6 | 11.11% |
I liked the 507 from day one |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
24 | 44.44% |
I still really dislike the 507 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
3 | 5.56% |
I would never consider a 507 over a 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
10 | 18.52% |
I would consider a 507 over a 382 |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
7 | 12.96% |
I dislike bronze as a case material |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
8 | 14.81% |
Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 54. You may not vote on this poll |
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
![]() |
#1 |
2025 TitaniumYM Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: CET
Posts: 36,344
|
![]()
now that the "shock" of another bronze panerai has passed, i thought i'd take another look at the 507.
what i've found is that i have completely warmed up to the PR on the dial. i like the balance it gives the dial and how the PR fills the empty space opposite the seconds dial. i also like the 3 lines on top vs the 2 and 2. and, going out on a limb, the two sub-dials, when coupled with the bronze case, give the watch an old-time analog feel, like an old submarine. lastly, for what it's worth, i think the back of the 507 is nicer than the 382. now, don't get me wrong, if i could choose between a 382 and 507 at list price, it would be a tough choice, but, i find that i can longer just dismiss the pronzo. how about you? ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.