ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
4 April 2014, 08:10 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: San Diego
Posts: 5
|
Bracelet sizing for small wrists: 14060M vs. 16610 vs. SubCs
Hi all,
I have been shopping for a Sub for a few weeks now. My wrists are on the smaller side, and I am trying to figure out the bracelet sizing issues that I have read about. As I understand it, the 14060M bracelet cannot be made small enough for some people without knocking out one of the permanent endlinks. I'd rather not do this. Does the 16610 have the same issue with bracelet design? I like the look of the ND better, but it doesn't make sense if it won't fit properly. I can't find either a 14060M or a 16610 locally to see if I can get the bracelet to fit. Finally, it sounds like the SubC bracelet fixed this issue by adding more removeable endlinks. Is that right? Any folks with SubCs and small wrists want to weigh in on fitment and appearance? I tried a SubC at an AD and wasn't sold on how the big lugs wear. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.