5726 or 5167?

[lapince]

Hi all, I am considering in some time, probably before summer, changing my Daytona 116515 either for a 5726 on bracelet with grey dial or a 5167 in SS.

It would be number 3 with a 5712 and a Hulk.

Of course the price difference is very big between the 2, and I am wondering if a 5712 and 5726, both on bracelet, is not too similar.

If I didn't have the 5712 I would not hesitate 1 second and go for the 5726, the AC and moon phase make it perfect IMO as a useful complications Patek, whereas the 5712 is an original and "funky" dial watch with basically useless complications but I love it.

I tried the 5167 but in RG, stunning but can't justify the huge price difference just for RG.

I chose the 5712 over the 5711 because as my first and maybe only Patek I wanted complications, but as a 2nd I can see the 5167 fitting nicely in a trio, as I have decided for some time already that I won't have more than 3-4 pieces.

All the posts I read say how the Aquanaut is incredibly comfortable, which I can imagine as my 5712 is by far the most comfortable watch I have owned, I used to like big and heavy watches but since my 5712 I like thin and light watches.

I would love to have opinions and feedback of people who have the Aquanaut, SS or RG and a Nautilus on bracelet, 5711 or 5712, my preference for now goes for the 5167 but still have doubts, your opinions will be very useful, thanks in advance