How crazy would someone be if...

[lapince]

Originally Posted by GB-man

+1

I'm selling my ceramic diver and reverting to a newly acquired SDc which suits me much better for day to day. Rolex design is timeless and hard to beat.

Ceramic diver for a Sub??? I've had the BLNR, sub LN and LV, sold all, the diver is such a more awesome watch, really, no question...

Originally Posted by benlee

Sounds like downgrading for me, but to each his own.

To me too…

Originally Posted by crazypilot

Don't neccessarily agree, but also depends on what else is in the lineup.
Personally prefer a BLNR over a Diver. But prefer a RO over a BLNR. Neither is an upgrade or downgrade in either case IMO. Both excellent watches and reputable brands.
Do it if it's what you want.

Not me, diver is way cooler IMO

Originally Posted by travisb

Nothing wrong with it at all. Price aside, many prefer the BLNR over the Diver.

Sure, the ones who don't have a diver

Originally Posted by Clivek

Had my Diver for six months now....absolutely love it.....and just sold my BLNR.

To each his own.....

Same here...

Originally Posted by toneafficianado

There's no logic in wanting a change..just go with your heart and try to get the best price for the one you're selling. Blnr is super special.

It's a very nice watch but for me a sub is nicer, and diver much nicer than sub...

Originally Posted by jjnd08

Sorry OP (and BLNR owners), but I have to agree with this.

Of course

Originally Posted by Prestige_Swiss

After wearing my SubC for about 2 years and recently acquiring a Diver its all on preference. They both wear well but its a different experience for each. Follow your heart like most are saying but also make sure you get the best deal in the end. Ultimately since you are asking I would say keep the Diver since I just got mine and Im on the honeymoon phase of just getting it heheh. Good Luck

The diver is much more comfortable than a sub