ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Submariner 1 · 21 July 2008, 10:56 AM

Greetings I am aware of the differences in the solid verses hollow end links of a new submariner. However is there a huge difference in the divers extension and the number of links behind the clasp. I have a 16610 and it looks completely different than a 14060 that I am contemplating. On my 16610 the divers extension is securely hidden behind extra links. On the 14060 the divers extension appears to be uncovered and actually deploys when you open the bracelet. Shoud it stay captive until relased? Or do you actually need to fold it in each time you put the watch on? Also there are no links covering it. Any info would be most helpful. Thanks in advance, Don

21 July 2008, 10:56 AM	#1
Submariner 1 "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Real Name: Don Location: ohio Watch: 16610 Sub Posts: 213	Clasp & divers extension difference between 16610 & 14060 Greetings I am aware of the differences in the solid verses hollow end links of a new submariner. However is there a huge difference in the divers extension and the number of links behind the clasp. I have a 16610 and it looks completely different than a 14060 that I am contemplating. On my 16610 the divers extension is securely hidden behind extra links. On the 14060 the divers extension appears to be uncovered and actually deploys when you open the bracelet. Shoud it stay captive until relased? Or do you actually need to fold it in each time you put the watch on? Also there are no links covering it. Any info would be most helpful. Thanks in advance, Don

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)