ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Hank · 5 November 2017, 01:06 AM

As some of you know, I picked up a PAM 233 not too long ago and I'm still in my honeymoon phase with it. I noticed the new PAM 682 while accompanying my friend to pick out his first watch at the AD. I instantly fell in love with it after trying it on. I've always admired the PAM 305/1305 but never considered getting it due to the size. I'm sure glad Panerai decided to release this smaller version.

Here are a few pictures of both my new PAMs side by side.

This was a complete impulse purchase. The 2mm difference make a huge difference especially for someone like me with relatively thin wrists. I loved the way it looked and felt on my wrist. The watch retains all the original DNA of Panerai while making it more accessible for guys with smaller wrists. Thanks for looking!

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

5 November 2017, 01:06 AM	#1
Hank "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2013 Location: Shanghai Posts: 1,715	Pam 682 As some of you know, I picked up a PAM 233 not too long ago and I'm still in my honeymoon phase with it. I noticed the new PAM 682 while accompanying my friend to pick out his first watch at the AD. I instantly fell in love with it after trying it on. I've always admired the PAM 305/1305 but never considered getting it due to the size. I'm sure glad Panerai decided to release this smaller version. Here are a few pictures of both my new PAMs side by side. This was a complete impulse purchase. The 2mm difference make a huge difference especially for someone like me with relatively thin wrists. I loved the way it looked and felt on my wrist. The watch retains all the original DNA of Panerai while making it more accessible for guys with smaller wrists. Thanks for looking! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)