ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

jag32 · 28 August 2019, 06:18 AM

It seems there is a cult like following for the 39mm Royal Oak and the 15202 in particular but not the 15300. Why is the 15202 so much more work sought after than the 15300 when they are both 39mm and pretty much visually look the same? For me, the 15300 is more preferable because I don’t like watches without second hands. Also, besides just an appropriate fit/size, what are are your reasons for preferring the 39mm RO to the 41mm RO? Is it mostly out of historical importance of 39mm being THE original RO?

28 August 2019, 06:18 AM	#1
jag32 Banned Join Date: Mar 2019 Location: DC Watch: PP/AP/BP/UN Posts: 1,015	Cult following for the 39mm Royal Oak It seems there is a cult like following for the 39mm Royal Oak and the 15202 in particular but not the 15300. Why is the 15202 so much more work sought after than the 15300 when they are both 39mm and pretty much visually look the same? For me, the 15300 is more preferable because I don’t like watches without second hands. Also, besides just an appropriate fit/size, what are are your reasons for preferring the 39mm RO to the 41mm RO? Is it mostly out of historical importance of 39mm being THE original RO?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)