ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 April 2022, 08:48 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 124
|
Risk of Quick Release Spring Bars Damaging Lug Holes?
I've seen some photos of people pairing their DJs with leather straps and I thought about giving it a try. Yes, I know that people here don't really like modern Rolex watches being worn on straps. But hey, I'm just trying it out for fun. Let's say I'd order a curved strap (to not risk scuffing the strap itself) from e.g. Molequin. Would there be any risk that the straps quick release spring bars can damage the lug holes, as they're not the same width as the original bars, nor the hole? Or am I just overthinking? :)
|
3 April 2022, 12:14 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 124
|
No one? Usually tend to get rather quick replies here. Perhaps I am overthinking, as it is question that might be to specific…
|
3 April 2022, 12:39 PM | #3 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Gary
Location: USA
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 11,912
|
I don’t see danger from quick release spring bars. I have several watches that have these and no problems whatsoever?!
__________________
|
3 April 2022, 12:40 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Texas
Posts: 554
|
I have used all kinds of shitty spring bars on my 114060. The holes in the lugs seem pretty universal or close enough it doesn’t matter.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
114060, 126710BLNR, BB58, SPB153 |
3 April 2022, 04:56 PM | #5 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: NL
Watch: Yachtmaster
Posts: 14,913
|
I would at least make sure that the diameter of the springbar tip is the same as the original for fear of failure and loosing the watch.
Personally I stick with Rolex supplied springbars only. I see no benefit in fitting any of my watches with a cheap aftermarket spring bar
__________________
Day Date 18238, Yachtmaster 16622, Deepsea 116660, Submariner 116619, SkyD 326935, DJ 178271, DJ 69158, Yachtmaster 169622, GMT 116713LN, GMT 126711. |
3 April 2022, 10:48 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: -
Posts: 124
|
Quote:
The thing I’m worried about is the diameter of bars differing from the original and if that might damage the holes somehow… |
|
4 April 2022, 12:52 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2021
Location: MD/NC
Watch: 114060
Posts: 2,591
|
I've not had any issue with this on my watches made of 316 (over a period of many years and many different straps being used on one watch in particular) that also used spring bars that are thicker, so I do not see any reason it would be different for watches made of 904.
Over time, you will likely scratch up the inside of the lugs a bit, but it's just cosmetic and not visible. FWIW, one thing I have learned to be careful with, especially on the straps with the quick release spring bars, is to give them a few good 'twists' and 'jerks' after installing the strap when over top of the bed, in case the fitment is poor to a point that this causes one of the spring bars to disengage. |
4 April 2022, 01:07 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2017
Location: IL
Posts: 188
|
Quote:
The problem with most quick release bar is that they come with bars with tips of .8mm when in fact you need ones that are .9mm for most modern Rolexes |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.