ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
16 October 2022, 01:37 PM | #31 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
|
Apparently back in 1959 the US Atomic Energy Commission warned about Rolex GMT-Masters being "excessively radioactive". Here's an article from Singapore's Straits Times newspaper from December that year, with a quote from Wilsdorf at the end.
__________________
_______________________ |
16 October 2022, 07:03 PM | #32 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,925
|
Good article from that era, Adam.
Many angles to the radium question. IMHO, the danger was to watchmakers, dial makers, repair staff, and material handlers who came in regular long-term contact with the alpha particles (both radium, and later, tritium). Not the Watch owners. But then many parties went berserk on both sides of the matter. Hans & Cie included. Let’s eat DDT too… Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
16 October 2022, 08:59 PM | #33 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
|
Here's a related article from August 1961, same Singapore newspaper running a UPI wire from New York. I wonder how far this case got in court, if it ever got there. Wilsdorf was dead by this time. Sorry for the rough cropping.
__________________
_______________________ |
16 October 2022, 09:51 PM | #34 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2018
Location: Colorado, USA
Posts: 6,260
|
I imagine that everyone has seen the radium GMT bezel recall document a million times already, but I'll add it here since the thread is going in that direction.
__________________
@oldwatchdan on IG |
16 October 2022, 10:04 PM | #35 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2022
Real Name: Paul
Location: Cantabrigia - G.B
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,811
|
Quote:
__________________
Thieves and fools and long travelled soldiers, A candid light exposes their homes. Human falter, people bellowed from their homes. And houses, there's fools and long reigning pharaohs. IT BITES - Yellow Christian |
|
16 October 2022, 11:02 PM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Watch: 5226G & 5513(1963)
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
Thanks for sharing! |
|
16 October 2022, 11:10 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Watch: 5226G & 5513(1963)
Posts: 352
|
Gentlemen, Thank you for posting the news paper clippings. Quite interesting to learn what was going on at the time in our country’s horological history.
I’m sure glad, in this modern world, that we don’t overreact like we did in the past!!! P.S.> At the end of WW2 when the occupational forces came into Japan, my 87 year old mother was covered with DDT powder by the US to address the rampant lice problem running through the city. |
17 October 2022, 12:10 AM | #38 | |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: PaulG
Location: Georgia
Posts: 41,925
|
Quote:
I imagine the company may have encouraged the plaintiff to settle for some figure. Or, the suit was dropped when the attorney bills began to mount. Interestingly, several watch websites have written different articles without any finding the outcome. Googling “Mound vs Rolex Federal Court” brings some of those results. I am glad the topic came up because I learned a new thing…storing my Dad’s old Radium dialed watches in the safe “emits” a build up of Radon gas over time. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Does anyone really know what time it is? |
|
17 October 2022, 12:26 AM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Watch: 5226G & 5513(1963)
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
IMHO it would be a shame to ruin such a preserved timepiece. However, in the example by LateLearner, I wouldn’t hesitate to have the radium removed and wear the watch since it belonged to his father. As DanS said in an earlier post, everyone needs to determine their acceptable level of risk. As I learn more on this topic and understand what is going on, my level of risk tolerence has increased. |
|
17 October 2022, 08:12 AM | #40 | |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Adam
Location: Far East
Watch: Golden Tuna
Posts: 28,794
|
Quote:
__________________
_______________________ |
|
17 October 2022, 09:31 AM | #41 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Japan
Posts: 4,366
|
Quote:
|
|
25 October 2023, 09:17 AM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2023
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1
|
Except she was wrong.
Quote:
So yes it was a good lecture but save your money and do not buy the pouches like I did. Live and learn for me. But, I’m disappointed that someone like her would nit have actually check it out before giving a lecture to people about it. |
|
26 October 2023, 08:07 AM | #43 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: USA
Watch: 5226G & 5513(1963)
Posts: 352
|
Quote:
Given the 12 - 15 timepieces you have, what approach did you settle on for storage of those watches? |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.