ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 August 2009, 08:11 PM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 193
|
The sixth Rolex - Sea Dweller. Any ideas?
Hello,
with five previous Rolexes (among them 2 subs, gmt, explorer 2, milgauss) I have now my eyes on the SD, the old version. The bottom line is that I have a buy limit in about 5K - which version of the SD do you recommend? I guess that the triple6 is pricier than my limit.. Any suggestion is appriciated! Thanks, and thanks for a great forum. |
15 August 2009, 08:18 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Life Patron
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,060
|
Well there has been very very very very little change to the SD since 1988/9. Now non lug hole case, different case date stamps, and some very minor font diffences, and thats it.So if you want something different then its the vintage route as from 1989/9 the SD are all mostly the same.
__________________
ICom Pro3 All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only. "The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever." Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again. www.mc0yad.club Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder |
15 August 2009, 09:21 PM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Ron
Location: Alabama
Watch: Daytona,TT Sub,GMT
Posts: 4,673
|
SDs are amazing watches from what I've read....built like tanks. It appears to me that you own all sport watches. May I recommend a DateJust. It changes it up a bit. Best of luck on your decision.
__________________
Ron |
15 August 2009, 10:25 PM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Annapolis, MD
Watch: Sea-Dweller 16600
Posts: 5,081
|
I would go for the regular 16600, with or without lug holes, depending on your preference. I personally would like lug holes, but I have a winner of a SD and I am not changing. You don't have to worry about oddball features like CRB or maxi-dial. Any 16600 is virtually the same watch. 5K should get you a complete late model LNIB.
|
15 August 2009, 10:58 PM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Allan
Location: California
Posts: 3,210
|
I would go for the SD in the best condition with boxes and papers and not care about the year.
Allan |
16 August 2009, 12:39 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Jib
Location: SJ, California
Watch: sun dial
Posts: 8,189
|
+1 on Allan
I actually think the lug holes make the watch look tough. Like a true tool watch. |
16 August 2009, 01:09 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2005
Real Name: Cal
Location: Seattle, WA.
Watch: explorer
Posts: 658
|
Rolex #6 for me was a SD-a great watch to add to your "gang"
|
16 August 2009, 03:47 AM | #8 |
Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Ron
Location: Michigan
Watch: SD
Posts: 318
|
Yup bought the SD last year, and have been ever so happy. Ron
|
16 August 2009, 03:54 AM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Jet
Location: SoCal, USA
Watch: SD/Sub/GMT/Daytona
Posts: 796
|
|
16 August 2009, 04:18 AM | #10 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Up a tree
Posts: 4,001
|
Ahhhhhhhhhhhhhh Sea Dwellers.......
|
16 August 2009, 04:35 AM | #11 |
Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: S.F. Peninsula
Watch: what you say!
Posts: 815
|
I'm considering purchasing an early 21st century SD. A totally modern watch that retains the lug holes.
|
16 August 2009, 04:52 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: Sweden
Posts: 193
|
Thanks for your replies, I just want to clarify that the SD is planned do be my sixth Rolex, although not at the same time - I have sold the previous ones.
Just now I have a Omega PO, and its feels a little bit odd when Im used to Rolex. PO is a nice watch, but something is wrong. I think you know what Im talking about Anyway. The hunt continues. The dream SD would be a triple6, but they are far more expensive than 5k, right?... |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.