The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 15 November 2024, 10:34 PM   #31
CaptT
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 557
Quote:
Originally Posted by brandrea View Post
That’s exactly right … the minute details are what make this hobby so interesting


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

So true, and so interesting what some people key in on. I’m “guilty” of this myself.

And given the various perspectives and preferences on the forum for 39 vs 40, Explorer name placement, crowns size and dial color differences, I can only imagine the ensuing discussions and debate should Rolex ever add crown guards to the Explorer models (as they did with the most recent Air-King).
CaptT is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 16 November 2024, 02:13 AM   #32
boa2
2024 Pledge Member
 
boa2's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Utah
Watch: Lover
Posts: 3,911
Quote:
Originally Posted by TimeAZ View Post
I think the 39mm Explorer 214270 is the best iteration of the explorer in its entire production line history. Just my biased opinion.
Agreed. Perfect watch, in my view.
__________________
"Facts and truth really don't have much to do with each other."
boa2 is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 02:48 AM   #33
MJ EXPLORER
2024 Pledge Member
 
MJ EXPLORER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ketler View Post
36, 39, 40...I really think it comes down to personal preference as they are all lovely watches...

I happen to have the 39mm version and it fits my 8 inch wrist like a glove...

In my 40 plus years of wearing a Rolex of one kind or another, it is without a doubt the most comfortable Rolex I have ever had.

And I prefer the placement of the text on this version...

I'm not sure why Rolex discontinued the 39mm version as it wears much more like a 40mm piece anyway in my opinion...

And the 3100 caliber movements have all stood the test of time (No pun intended)...


Attachment 1467667

40 years!! That's an amazing testimony of the Explorer. I think the "40" is a realization that they shouldn't have discontinued the 39. It's basically the same watch, but for two things. The wider bracelet and glossy dial (with AR coating) are immediatly obvious on the 40. I think it comes down to preference between matte and glossy.

When the mk2 39 came out I though it was the best watch ever made. I ever so slightly prefer the 40, but they are really close.

Great shot of your Explorer by the way!
MJ EXPLORER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 02:51 AM   #34
MJ EXPLORER
2024 Pledge Member
 
MJ EXPLORER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaptT View Post
So true, and so interesting what some people key in on. I’m “guilty” of this myself.

And given the various perspectives and preferences on the forum for 39 vs 40, Explorer name placement, crowns size and dial color differences, I can only imagine the ensuing discussions and debate should Rolex ever add crown guards to the Explorer models (as they did with the most recent Air-King).
Crown guards on the Explorer would break the Rolex Forum! 116900 vs 126900 Air-Kings is much more of a discussion as they are wildly different in case shape/thickness. I've always considered the modern Air-King's to somewhat of a testing ground for the Explorer....much like the Yacht-Master was for the Submariner. Not that I think they'll ever implement them, but more of a model they can play around with without offending the purists.
MJ EXPLORER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 02:55 AM   #35
MJ EXPLORER
2024 Pledge Member
 
MJ EXPLORER's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2021
Real Name: Mike
Location: Arkansas
Watch: Explorer 40
Posts: 1,024
Quote:
Originally Posted by WatchBum View Post
Go smaller even better, Go 36mm
I tried the modern 36 (steel and two tone) and loved them for a good long while. Then woke up one day and thought "these are too small for me." I did the same thing with the DEEPSEA recently. Wore it as a daily for 6 months and absolutely loved it. Then woke up one day and thought "it's too big for me."

I think my sweet spot is 40 to 42....but like all things with watches, my taste will evolve/change.
MJ EXPLORER is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 04:56 AM   #36
noshame
"TRF" Member
 
noshame's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2020
Real Name: Alex
Location: Canada
Posts: 1,664
Congrats, MJ! Super happy for you. I too love the 40's gloss dial with AR coating, really makes the dial look inky black. Enjoy!
__________________
Submariner Date 116610LN | GMT-Master II 126710BLNR on Jubilee | Explorer Rolesor 124273 | Explorer II Polar 226570
noshame is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 04:58 AM   #37
toomuchtalk
"TRF" Member
 
toomuchtalk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,248
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ EXPLORER View Post
There it is! The mk1 looking good.

best one
toomuchtalk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 05:17 AM   #38
so nice
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: home
Posts: 37
40mm or 36mm over the 39mm every time
so nice is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 07:31 AM   #39
Cru Jones
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Cru Jones's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Paris, France
Posts: 35,255
114270 for me.
Cru Jones is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 07:48 AM   #40
watchwatcher
"TRF" Member
 
watchwatcher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Larry
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Yes
Posts: 35,002
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ EXPLORER View Post
I've had it for about 12 hours now....First thing that I noticed was the wider bracelet. I realize that's a negative for some, but I absolutely prefer it! Same with the matte (39) vs glossy (40) dial. Part of the reason I wanted to go with the 40 is my favorite pics are when the dial looks dark black. Combined with the AR coating, this deep black dial is amazing! Couldn't be happier!
Awesome.
watchwatcher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 November 2024, 12:00 PM   #41
WristWatchWonders
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2022
Location: Earth
Posts: 561
I prefer "Explorer" text at 6:00pm. It looks a bit crowded at 12:00pm to me.

Sent from my moto g 5G - 2023 using Tapatalk
WristWatchWonders is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2024, 03:43 AM   #42
dmesserly
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Virginia
Watch: GMT II Coke
Posts: 9
Digressing a bit on the prior pic with the Milgauss, the crown at the top where the triangle is on the Explorer, separated out from the text, is a great balance with 3 lines at 12 and 2 lines at 6 whereas the Explorer is a bit crowded with the crown and 3 lines together.

When looking at the 39 vs 40, I like the 39 text better with the crown sort of acting as the third line up top with 3 lines at the bottom.

Both watches look great though and I would probably go for the 40 for the gloss black dial, slightly thinner hour hand, bigger crown and the wider bracelet.
dmesserly is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 November 2024, 04:07 AM   #43
Afratello03
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: North Carolina
Posts: 75
39mm is more of a better option, it wears perfectly IMO.
Afratello03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2024, 06:50 PM   #44
Ketler
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: USA
Posts: 467
Quote:
Originally Posted by MJ EXPLORER View Post
40 years!! That's an amazing testimony of the Explorer. I think the "40" is a realization that they shouldn't have discontinued the 39. It's basically the same watch, but for two things. The wider bracelet and glossy dial (with AR coating) are immediatly obvious on the 40. I think it comes down to preference between matte and glossy.

When the mk2 39 came out I though it was the best watch ever made. I ever so slightly prefer the 40, but they are really close.

Great shot of your Explorer by the way!
Thank you.
Ketler is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 November 2024, 06:57 PM   #45
dove
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2024
Location: usa
Posts: 26
I recommend the Explorer 40mm for its modern upgrades, improved movement, and slightly enhanced legibility, making it the better choice for those seeking the latest features.
dove is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2024, 05:32 AM   #46
Miker86
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: May 2020
Location: UK
Posts: 277
Explorer 39mm the winner
Miker86 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2024, 05:47 AM   #47
MichelleP
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2013
Location: Bay Area
Watch: DD 40RG Olive dial
Posts: 4,613
Congratulations on the Explorer. I have the 36mm and it's a great watch. the 40 was too much dial for my 6.3" wrist.
__________________
Michelle
MichelleP is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 21 November 2024, 07:16 AM   #48
OG1982
2024 Pledge Member
 
OG1982's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2020
Real Name: Ollie
Location: UK
Watch: Sub41 OP36 & DJ36
Posts: 1,965
36 is the correct answer.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
OG1982 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2024, 06:37 AM   #49
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN
"TRF" Member
 
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: KAAN
Location: ISTANBUL
Watch: Explorer-PAM233
Posts: 1,648
I like the explorer text on the six o’clock position and I also like the matte dial, but I like all the things that 40 mm given to me, so my choice was the 40mm Explorer..
DOUBLE 0 SE7EN is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2024, 07:18 AM   #50
Aman08
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2022
Location: USA
Posts: 154
Both are wonderful watches. It is whichever one you like the best. I have a DJ 41 and should be picking up a 40mm Explorer in the next few weeks. Wear it and enjoy!!!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Aman08 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 25 November 2024, 03:52 PM   #51
kenco
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: London
Posts: 60
Should be pointed out that, from what Ive read and pics Ive seen, the 40mm has a notch inbetween the lugs that the bracelet uses to slot in and has a tighter spring bar to case gap. Thus something to be aware about if youre a nato strap fan or like switching straps in general
kenco is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply

Tags
explorer


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.