![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 28
|
Move On 124270 For 214270 or 41mm OP?
Is it realistic with the market right now to try and trade my 124270 1:1 for a 214270 or black/blue dial Oyster Perpetual?
My other Rolex is a BLNR and have been wondering if maybe the OP could be a dressier complement (I have both bracelets), or the 214270’s matte dial could be a nice touch. |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2019
Real Name: Vincent
Location: 215
Watch: SS Sub
Posts: 2,484
|
maybe with a private seller, but still tough because the newer reference worth more @ both MSRP and 2nd market.
most likely no for grey because why would they trade you a newer reference without money on top? |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Location Location
Posts: 1,825
|
214270 ftw
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#4 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,706
|
Move On 124270 For 214270 or 41mm OP?
Loving the glossy black dial on the newer references. I suppose the 39 looks more tool like, and may be preferable to some, though. Each to his own. OP, I’d keep what you have, or if size is the issue, trade for the 224270. It can be used for dressy occasions. It’s black, has Mercedes hands. Very versatile piece, IMO. ![]() Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Podgorica, MNE
Posts: 384
|
Agreed! I love my 214270....the matte dial and the size are perfect.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Location Location
Posts: 1,825
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Location: USA
Posts: 28
|
Move On 124270 For 214270 or 41mm OP?
Quote:
Thanks for the insight! Hmm, maybe I’m just looking to move things around for no reason—wouldn’t be the first time! My first Rolex was a 114270 and I always have enjoyed this size—I sold that to get the 124270. Plus, the BLNR complements it much better than if I had a 40mm watch sitting next to so that’s my concern with the 224270. The OP might be a dressier alternative, but not sure if it would be able to dress up and down quite as seamlessly. You might have cracked it thank you! |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: Podgorica, MNE
Posts: 384
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#9 | |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: Kat
Location: CA, USA
Watch: 126233 Wimbledon T
Posts: 7,706
|
Quote:
You are very welcome. Glad I could help. I had a hunch you just had the itch for a change. The 124270 is a near perfect Rolex, for any occasion. Take care. Kat Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.