ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 January 2025, 06:27 PM | #91 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: HK
Posts: 213
|
Quote:
Maybe nautilus will go precious metal and all SS models will be the cubitus?? |
|
26 January 2025, 02:43 AM | #92 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2025
Location: Singapore
Posts: 7
|
I had the same dilemma.. but decided on 5712 in the end with no regrets.. I have small wrists so 5712 was perfect for me.. I also prefer the asymmetrical dial.. way more interesting to me.. I also have a funny feeling 5712 could follow the 5711 to 5811 route..
I was originally aiming for the 5726, but when I tried it on, it wasn’t for me. The thickness and bigger dial felt too boxy to me, esp when the dial was already squarish.. Either way, both are absolute grails and can’t go wrong. |
26 January 2025, 04:54 AM | #93 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Real Name: Nautilus Hunt
Location: New York
Posts: 56
|
5712 wins the race for me. Would love the 5726 in a thinner case… PP proved it with the 5740 rendition.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
29 January 2025, 01:21 PM | #94 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2021
Location: Merica
Posts: 1,376
|
I go 5726 every day. Annual calendar, more wrist presence, much sportier looking
|
Yesterday, 12:36 PM | #95 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 9,343
|
I prefer 5726 due to thickness and feeling of being more durable.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.