ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
27 November 2009, 06:58 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Boris
Location: Chicago,IL
Posts: 3,521
|
pam 88 for me
|
27 November 2009, 06:58 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2008
Real Name: Jesse
Location: Portland, Oregon
Posts: 1,001
|
|
27 November 2009, 06:59 AM | #33 |
Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 459
|
Thats not a fair shot because the Panerai GMT with the SS Bracelet would look better I tried my friends Panerai GMT 4 days ago and it is a stunner but with the SS bracelet. The leather band not for me on any watch
|
27 November 2009, 07:27 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
|
27 November 2009, 07:39 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Real Name: ExhibitionOnly
Location: Earth
Posts: 329
|
|
27 November 2009, 09:12 AM | #36 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
That photo was taken shortly after I got the watch and was playing with the rubber strap. Here's one I really like, |
|
27 November 2009, 09:22 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Rick
Location: At what TIME?!!!
Watch: the SKY tonite!
Posts: 3,225
|
gmt (ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ROLEX ...)
|
27 November 2009, 11:15 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Shawn
Location: United States
Watch: SS GMT IIC
Posts: 1,624
|
Had a Panerai and now have a Rolex Gmt IIC. The Rollie is by far the better watch!
|
27 November 2009, 11:58 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Dean
Location: Philippines
Posts: 1,037
|
rolie baby! i think the PAM's running a lil bit late
kidding aside, depends i guess on what you want and what you already have. I personally wouldn't mind owning a PAM. but not before another few rolexes. but that's just me.. |
27 November 2009, 12:03 PM | #40 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
Pam 88 is the only Panerai that I like.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
27 November 2009, 12:41 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: 116234
Posts: 4,150
|
II C all the way! The pam is nice but the IIc is ridiculously nice lol
|
27 November 2009, 12:51 PM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: US
Watch: Rolex, Patek
Posts: 2,474
|
I still think the size of the PAM's is a fad that will go out of style in the near term. Go Rolex all the way...it looks great and 40mm is something that will always stand the test of time.
|
27 November 2009, 12:55 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
Mike, that is a great looking strap. I think this is one fun/easy thing with PAM - you can change strap, not with Rolex.
|
27 November 2009, 12:57 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
|
27 November 2009, 01:02 PM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: PA
Posts: 1,034
|
Deyn Man: you are right about that, this is my first PAM, I already have few rolex - SS Daytona, SS/PL YM, SS GMT2C, TT DateJust...
Last edited by zlin08033; 27 November 2009 at 01:06 PM.. Reason: , |
27 November 2009, 01:07 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Kentucky
Watch: 118208
Posts: 2,510
|
Rolex, no question.
__________________
|
27 November 2009, 03:17 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Carl
Location: Vancouver, Canada
Watch: Rolex Explorer 1
Posts: 1,780
|
I have always like the PAM, but the one in this pic is definitely not my favourite. The Rolex looks a lot better.
BTW, thank you for the comparison shot. I have always somewhat lusted after the PAM, I guess I just didn't realize how big they are. When you see 44mm in print, it doesn't really sink in. When I see it in a pic like that, I realize the watch would be far too big for me. That's one I can cross off my list! (not meaning any disrespect to PAMs) Cheers, Carl
__________________
Those who possess a sense of entitlement are seldom satisfied. |
27 November 2009, 04:06 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: Arizona, USA.
Watch: Your Six...!!!....
Posts: 207
|
.....DUDE......ROLEX GMT IIC ......
.....Don't even be caught dead with other one...!!!!.... |
27 November 2009, 04:36 PM | #49 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: jP
Location: Texas
Watch: GMT-MASTER
Posts: 17,307
|
Pam for me. But, if comparing to the older, GMT II model 16710, I'd take the GMT II.
__________________
Member of NAWCC since 1990. INSTAGRAM USER NAME: SPRINGERJFP Visit my Instagram page to view some of the finest vintage GMTs anywhere - as well as other vintage classics. |
27 November 2009, 05:31 PM | #50 |
Member
Join Date: Nov 2009
Real Name: Dave
Location: Texas
Watch: SS Daytona
Posts: 314
|
Pam in this case. Also many Pams also come in 40mm.......... The best option is to have both!..............
|
27 November 2009, 05:56 PM | #51 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Socal
Posts: 4,960
|
I like the GMT IIc better, then PAM (88 right?) has too much going on on the dial
|
27 November 2009, 05:57 PM | #52 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,474
|
In the Rolex section the GMT wins hands down.
In the Pam Forum the Luminor GMT romps in. I'll have both. Pam first, then the SS GMT IIc 'cos I have a TT.
__________________
E |
27 November 2009, 08:14 PM | #53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2009
Real Name: Alejandro
Location: Chicago, IL
Posts: 185
|
Rolex hands down !!!
|
27 November 2009, 09:29 PM | #54 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: SK
Location: Greenland
Watch: Various SUBs
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
I say the GMT.... (what a surprice!!!)
__________________
Founder and CEO of the "BLUME" Club Rolex ref: 14060 - 92', 16600- 06', 116610LN 11' In Da House!! He who only loves one woman and one watch, doesn't truly love women or watches!! "Not all that is countable, counts; and not all that counts, is countable" |
|
27 November 2009, 09:55 PM | #55 |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Tristan
Location: GIRONA , SPAIN
Watch: 116520/660/710/334
Posts: 7,147
|
|
28 November 2009, 12:48 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: ED
Location: PHILIPPINES
Posts: 377
|
im torn between the two, both are fantastic watches
|
28 November 2009, 12:57 AM | #57 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Eric
Location: Location,Location
Watch: this, bro...
Posts: 15,340
|
|
28 November 2009, 01:00 AM | #58 |
Banned
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Nick
Location: FL
Posts: 767
|
Rolex without a doubt
|
28 November 2009, 01:05 AM | #59 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2009
Real Name: Gabriel
Location: Virginia
Watch: 14060M / 16613
Posts: 141
|
Rolex Rolex Rolex! PAM's just don't do it for me...but then this is TRF after all...most here are crazy about Rolex.
__________________
Four-wheel drive pickup I remember his last words: Hold my beer, watch this! |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.