ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

50peso · 24 March 2010, 03:37 AM

I have tried on a sub, although its a great looking watch, it feels too big. The Datejust feels a bit small for me (36mm). I am awaiting the new Explorer 1 in 39mm, This may just be the perfect size for me. Anyone else in the same situation?

CPTL · 24 March 2010, 03:42 AM

Try a black-dial Exp-II. It's the same diameter (40mm) as the Sub, but the bracelet and case are much thinner, and the sloping fixed bezel makes it look much smaller on the wrist than the Sub.

All the function, but with a smaller look and more comfortable feel. You can't go wrong with the Exp-II.

Did I say that the Exp-II is a fantastic watch??

JJ Irani · 24 March 2010, 03:45 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by CPTL

Try a black-dial Exp-II. It's the same diameter (40mm) as the Sub, but the bracelet and case are much thinner, and the sloping fixed bezel makes it look much smaller on the wrist than the Sub.

All the function, but with a smaller look and more comfortable feel. You can't go wrong with the Exp-II.

Did I say that the Exp-II is a fantastic watch??

Sure is......but it's actually 39 mm and not 40 mm due to the fixed, sloping bezel.

I love the new Explorer, but lack of date and cyclops would be a deterrent, that's all. Otherwise, it's a beauty!! Perfect size of 39 mm too.

JJ

The GMT Master · 24 March 2010, 03:55 AM

I have to say, I'm seriously thinking about flipping my 116200 for it. I'll have to see if I can get my hands on one from the first shipment

chillviper · 24 March 2010, 04:04 AM

Can't wait. Jury is still out on those tiny hands though.

mtrunner · 24 March 2010, 04:08 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by chillviper

Can't wait. Jury is still out on those tiny hands though.

I feel the same way. I like the bigger size but I am still not sure what it is going to look like in person with the smaller hands. It looks disproportionate in the pictures.

kingblackbolt · 24 March 2010, 04:32 AM

I think it is a big improvement on a model that was probably not flying off the shelves...

TheDude · 24 March 2010, 04:35 AM

Yes, I am excited. I have been vocal about wanting to see an updated, larger, matte Explorer for some time now.

I noticed something when I was looking at Jocke's Basel report. In the Explorer photos, I noticed that due to the matte dial, the shadow that is cast by the hands is visible on the lighter dial. That makes them look fatter and bigger than they really are (at least at a distance).

I don't know if that was a consideration when Rolex made the decision to use those hands, but it could be a possible motivation.

Jocke's photo...

Xenophon · 24 March 2010, 04:38 AM

I've already ordered mine form my AD. Looking forward to getting it in the Autumn

Wolfgang427 · 24 March 2010, 04:39 AM

Is anyone else anxious for the new Explorer 1?

No,

I don't think 3mm makes a hugh difference in a watch that is otherwise the same as the old model(and that wasn't a big seller as well).

TheDude · 24 March 2010, 04:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Xenophon

I've already ordered mine form my AD. Looking forward to getting it in the Autumn

Sweet! I am not putting my name on any lists (so as not to tip off the AD to my level of interest).

I'm hoping this little shop I know of that never seems to move any inventory will give me a healthy discount in the fall.

Rich2putt · 24 March 2010, 05:08 AM

At this juncture, the Explore ll white does it for me.

24 March 2010, 03:37 AM	#1
50peso "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2009 Location: ri Posts: 76	Is anyone else anxious for the new Explorer 1? I have tried on a sub, although its a great looking watch, it feels too big. The Datejust feels a bit small for me (36mm). I am awaiting the new Explorer 1 in 39mm, This may just be the perfect size for me. Anyone else in the same situation?

24 March 2010, 03:42 AM	#2
CPTL "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2007 Real Name: Kevin Location: Texas on my mind Watch: Sub Date; SS/WG DJ Posts: 2,445	Try a black-dial Exp-II. It's the same diameter (40mm) as the Sub, but the bracelet and case are much thinner, and the sloping fixed bezel makes it look much smaller on the wrist than the Sub. All the function, but with a smaller look and more comfortable feel. You can't go wrong with the Exp-II. Did I say that the Exp-II is a fantastic watch?? __________________ 16610 Submariner Date; D Serial 16234 DateJust SS with WG Fluted Bezel & Jubillee, White Roman Dial; F Serial 16570 Explorer II White Dial; M Serial And Hers: 78240 Mid-Size DateJust SS with Domed Bezel & Oyster, White Roman; D Serial

24 March 2010, 04:32 AM	#7
kingblackbolt "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2005 Real Name: Ren Location: Toronto On Canada Posts: 1,886	I think it is a big improvement on a model that was probably not flying off the shelves... __________________ “Hail to the king, baby" Ash (Army of Darkness 1992)

24 March 2010, 04:38 AM	#9
Xenophon 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2008 Real Name: Xenophon Location: UK Posts: 2,728	I've already ordered mine form my AD. Looking forward to getting it in the Autumn __________________ The sea! The sea! Θάλαττα! θάλαττα!

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

24 March 2010, 03:55 AM	#4
The GMT Master "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2008 Real Name: Chris Location: England Posts: 8,150	I have to say, I'm seriously thinking about flipping my 116200 for it. I'll have to see if I can get my hands on one from the first shipment

24 March 2010, 04:04 AM	#5
chillviper "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2009 Location: Atlanta Watch: SS Daytona Posts: 509	Can't wait. Jury is still out on those tiny hands though.

24 March 2010, 04:35 AM	#8
TheDude "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2007 Location: DC Area, USA Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660 Posts: 4,492	Yes, I am excited. I have been vocal about wanting to see an updated, larger, matte Explorer for some time now. I noticed something when I was looking at Jocke's Basel report. In the Explorer photos, I noticed that due to the matte dial, the shadow that is cast by the hands is visible on the lighter dial. That makes them look fatter and bigger than they really are (at least at a distance). I don't know if that was a consideration when Rolex made the decision to use those hands, but it could be a possible motivation. Jocke's photo...

24 March 2010, 04:39 AM	#10
Wolfgang427 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Aug 2006 Real Name: Wolfgang Location: New Jersey. Watch: Rolex Tudor Omega Posts: 5,592	Is anyone else anxious for the new Explorer 1? No, I don't think 3mm makes a hugh difference in a watch that is otherwise the same as the old model(and that wasn't a big seller as well).

24 March 2010, 05:08 AM	#12
Rich2putt "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2010 Real Name: Rich Location: MA Watch: TOG, Exp ll white Posts: 549	At this juncture, the Explore ll white does it for me.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)