SS sub ceramic LN or gmt II??

[petesjag]

I love my GMT but need to see the sub in person to really be able to give advice about the two...
Im pretty smitten about the hulk lv though...

[DOUBLE 0 SE7EN]

Get this baby....

[chronus]

Originally Posted by jonathon555

Both are iconic models , I prefer the bezel on the sub , but I prefer the bracelet on the gmt c

The gmt is a touch more bling bling, sub c is very sweet looking

I Have the gmt c & I would also like a sub c

Both are awsome.

Have to agree with you that they are both awesome Jonathon, but have to disagree that the GMT is more bling bling. I mean they essentially look the same with the exception of more numbers on the bezel for the GMT due to it's additional complication. If it had diamonds all over it, I could agree but to me it's just a different bezel based on function. Just my opinion.

[Chad C.]

Originally Posted by jonathon555

Both are iconic models , I prefer the bezel on the sub , but I prefer the bracelet on the gmt c

The gmt is a touch more bling bling, sub c is very sweet looking

I Have the gmt c & I would also like a sub c

Both are awsome.

I completely agree - I prefer the bezel on the Sub - love it actually. However, I like the bracelet and the bling factor on the GMT IIc. I am going back and forth between these two but think the GMT will win out.

[Psmith]

Originally Posted by ayres

hi clive, i'm curious to know where specifically you find the lug width and case thickness of these two models. short of actually measuring the watches, i've never come across any released data.

Hi - from a discussion with one of the watchmakers at Rolex Australia.



Cheers