The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Vintage Rolex Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 8 July 2010, 02:22 AM   #1
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Rolex Twin Lock Crown variants: Experts please see within

Rolex Twin Lock Crown variants:

During my journey into the complicated Rolex parts world I discovered variants to the twin lock crown. I was under the impression that twin lock crowns were phased out by Rolex in the early 70’s with the introduction of the trip lock design series which lead to most twin lock crowns on subs being replaced with the newer trip lock crowns when needed at service. However I have come across variants of the twin lock. If Rolex phased out the twin lock, how did this variant develop? Any experts know how the existence of the variant came about? The pictures below show the variant observed.
This is what I believed to be the only version of the twin lock tube and crown. It has the look of crimped stainless steel housing and a short tube:




Several examples of a variant:
Notice how the stainless steel appears to be pressed over another type of material.

Here is another photo of a different watch showing the variant:



Any info on the differences and when they were/are made?
Thanks
CaveDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2010, 12:38 AM   #2
Dan Pierce
2024 Pledge Member
 
Dan Pierce's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Real Name: D'OH!
Location: Kentucky
Watch: Rolex-1 Tudor-3
Posts: 36,182
CaveDiver, sorry, can't answer all your questions but both the twinlock and triplock crowns are used simultaneously on different references. The Sub, SD, DSSD, Yachtmaster use the triplock while the GMT II [older version], Explorer II, DJ, and DD [36mm] use the twinlock.
I don't think they can replace different crowns at service either.
dP
__________________
TRF Member# 1668
Bass Player in TRF "AFTER DARK" Bar & NightClub Band
Commander-in-Chief of The Nylon Nation
The Crown & Shield Club
Honorary Member of P-Club
Dan Pierce is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2010, 12:42 AM   #3
Welshwatchman
"TRF" Member
 
Welshwatchman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
Troll removed.
__________________
..33
Welshwatchman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 9 July 2010, 12:46 AM   #4
Nicko
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Not here anymore
Posts: 4,787
Quote:
Originally Posted by Welshwatchman View Post
Troll removed.



Troll killer extraordinaire!!!
Nicko is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2010, 07:40 AM   #5
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
no one has any explanations?
CaveDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2010, 01:52 PM   #6
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,495
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaveDiver View Post
no one has any explanations?
There have been a few variants of the "Twinlock" over the years......

The Sub didn't get the bar under the crown until the early 60's with the 5508 but the first 5513,s and 1680's didn't get the bar and only had the crown... also some were given the "Brevet" twinlock crown..

The Triplock didn't come around until the early 70's, but there was no mandate to replace earlier twins with trips at service, although it's not that difficult to do..

All of the early crowns were crimped (formed) caps around the threaded core. The current monobloc crowns are only about a decade old.........

I guess that I don't really know the question............
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 July 2010, 02:06 PM   #7
CaveDiver
"TRF" Member
 
CaveDiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas
Posts: 1,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post

I guess that I don't really know the question............
Sorry, I guess I was not very clear and relied on the pictures to explain.
I’m referring to the 5512/13/1680 twin lock of the 60’s like the ones in the photographs.
1) I thought Rolex stopped producing these a long time ago. Apparently that is not true and was looking for conformation.
2) Of this style for the 5512/13/1680 of the middle to late 60’s that I have seen until recently were like the crimped ones shown in the first couple of pictures. I was wondering where this other style that has the stainless steel pressed instead of crimped came from if Rolex stopped manufacturing these crowns back in the 70’s. So, does that mean Rolex is still manufacturing these crowns?
Does this help clarify my questions?
Thanks
CaveDiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.