ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 August 2010, 10:45 AM | #31 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: USA
Watch: DRSD 1665 #3551XXX
Posts: 2,401
|
If the watch was stolen then RSC would keep the watch if someone tried to have it serviced (if it was reported) and wouldn't return the watch with a service paper.......so you can be sure that service papers give you some insurance that the watch isn't "hot".
|
5 August 2010, 10:46 AM | #32 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Piedmont, CA
Watch: various vintage
Posts: 2,272
|
Quote:
That leads into the list of things you should consider if you're buying, no matter if it's a modern or vintage Rolex: Future appreciation/resale value Obsessiveness with detail/completeness Value/price ratio Daily beater or safe queen? If any of the first 2, as well as if it's going to be a safe queen/occasional wear piece, are at the top of your list, you're better off getting a piece with b&p. If you're looking for a good value for a piece you're going to wear a lot that you'd never consider selling, then go the non-b&p route. One final consideration is this - - if anyone here were presented with two watches of the exact same model and production time in the same condition from sellers with impeccable reps, if the watches were priced similarly, everyone would opt for the piece with b&p. Basically, everyone would consider a Rolex with b&p if it were priced right, but there are plenty of folks who would pass on one w/o b&p even if it was priced accordingly. Even if you never plan to sell it, you never know what may happen. Knock on wood that this never happens, but if you ever needed to raise some fast cash, you'll make out much better (and faster) if your watch had b&p. And if you were to pass on your watch to your heirs, they'll appreciate the fact you invested in one with b&p if they decide not to keep it.
__________________
1680 MK II 2.2M (my daily); 1655 MK IV 8.1M (my 1st vintage); 16660 x 4 - 8.0M spider & matte 7.4M, 8.0M, 8.0M; 16610LV F MK I/MK I; 116528 Z; 14060 M COSC; Tudor 75090 Gone.....never forgotten: 14000 F, 14060 V COSC, PAM 048, 16623 F, 1680 MK V 3.1M, 16800 matte 8.3M & 1655 MK IV 7.4M |
|
5 August 2010, 12:04 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: usa
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 6,962
|
B&P are nice, but not crucial for me. I like the discount I get when the watch is without b&p. I'd imagine they are easier to fake than the watch itself so I've never believed that they could protect against buying a fake. IMO they are really only important when it comes time to sell as many buyers really prefer them. Honestly, I have a small apt here in the city and storing all that stuff is a PITA. Were it not for other's desire for the b&p, I would have thrown all that stuff away as soon as I peeled the stickers off my watch...
|
5 August 2010, 10:33 PM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: DC Area, USA
Watch: IIc,1680 Red,16660
Posts: 4,492
|
Don't forget there are other ways to establish provenance for vintage pieces.
Service invoices from Bob Ridley or Rolex, etc... Being able to prove you bought it from a reputable broker like Steve M... It's not the same as a complete history with B&P, but it's certainly better than nothing at all. |
5 August 2010, 11:46 PM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
As mentioned earlier, if you decide to pursue a watch without b&p, always buy the seller before buying the watch. There's a reason why its considerably cheaper, its not complete. So, if you ever decide to sell...best of luck. For modern watches, its a lot easier to sell a watch with b&p than without.
IMO, since its your 1st, pay the addt'l premium by going the b&p route. Happy Hunting! |
6 August 2010, 02:07 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: Scottsdale, AZ
Posts: 9
|
Right now, I'm leaning towards a SS DJ - a sharp, classic look. Something I can wear every day, dress it up or down.
|
6 August 2010, 03:08 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
|
10 August 2010, 06:34 PM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2009
Location: Hk
Posts: 10
|
With vintage watches, b&p always creats a premium and would be a perfect find, especially with tools watches like the subs and gmts when usually paperwork gets displaced/lost.
But, on balance, condition of the overall timepiece will command sellability and buyers. I would rather have a minty cased and dial vintage without than a ropey cased watch with b&p. |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.