ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
|
|
Thread Tools | Display Modes |
14 April 2011, 06:09 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
|
Your Thoughts: Why are more SS Ceramic Subs resold than SS Ceramic GMTIIcs
It seems to me, browsing the Sale section here on TRF, that proportionally more SS Ceramic Subs (116610) are being "resold" than SS GMTIIcs (116710). Not sure my "unscientific" sampling is indicative of anything, but I thought I would throw this out, and see what folks thought.
Would one see this because folks like their SS Ceramic GMTIIcs so much they never flip them, thus fewer available for the secondary market, or conversely, because folks prefer the SS Ceramic Subs so much, that proportionally more Subs are purchased than GMTIIcs, even though the Ceramic GMTIIc has been out longer than the Ceramic Sub? I would have thought I would see more SS Ceramic GMTs on the secondary market, versus SS Ceramic Subs, if for no other reason than the GMTs have been out for a few years longer........ Any and all thoughts and observations appreciated, as I continue to attempt to understand the psychology of my being a Rolex addict! Thanks, Nathan (ps....good luck to everyone who is participating in the Explorer II Give-away!)
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976) 116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) + 116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil) Who else needs an Intervention? (109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5 RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend |
14 April 2011, 06:16 AM | #2 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Bryan
Location: Pacific Northwest
Watch: YG DD lchdp
Posts: 2,963
|
Quote:
this would be my guess |
|
14 April 2011, 06:22 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Chris
Location: England
Posts: 8,150
|
I think it's more to do with the fact that the Sub is still a novelty, and people can flip them for a decent price. The interest in the GMT has died down recently, and prices have been affected accordingly. Wait until the next price rise, and you'll see more GMTs again
|
14 April 2011, 06:23 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: Jonathan
Location: Ottawa
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 1,246
|
Agree and especially since it is the newer model generating lots of interest. The gmt 11 c likely had lots of turnove a few years ago when it was new. Likely in a few years the ratio or resales will settle down to be roughly the same as their sales volumes. (my guess obviously). Cheers!
|
14 April 2011, 06:23 AM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: usa
Posts: 6,765
|
Perhaps people thought they'd like it more than they actually did? If you were a huge Sub enthusiast, naturally you'd want the latest iteration, but with its new case, bracelet and shiny ceramic bezel, maybe you just could never get into it. You'd have to look at the numbers of GMT IIc watches being flipped when they first came out (and may have been the subject of a similar phenomenon) to really draw a comparison.
|
14 April 2011, 06:24 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Rich
Location: Canada
Watch: Milgauss, GMT IIc
Posts: 3,013
|
Possibly because the 'curmudgeon movement' has convinced Sub C owners they need a pre-ceramic model instead, so they're selling their ceramics.
Or your first reason - there are more Subs out there, hence more to be sold. |
14 April 2011, 06:24 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: USA
Posts: 1,950
|
People want it plain and simple. My AD does not even have them displayed they get them in and call the waiting list, they never even make it to the display case.
__________________
|
14 April 2011, 07:57 AM | #8 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Palo Alto, CA
Watch: Sub-C No-Cyclops
Posts: 58
|
Quote:
It's probably a combo of the availability and interest/novelty. I suspect it'll die down once the new EXP IIs and other new models pop up. Demand seems to drive a lot of it... |
|
14 April 2011, 08:01 AM | #9 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Charles B
Location: GMT -7
Watch: Hulk 116610LV
Posts: 6,131
|
Quote:
__________________
Hulk 116610LV + GMT II 126710 BLNR + Explorer 124270 + Air King 126900 + Submariner 16613LB |
|
14 April 2011, 08:10 AM | #10 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Eric
Location: Long Beach CA USA
Watch: Rolex Explorer II
Posts: 4,102
|
More Subs than GMT's is the reason IMO.
|
14 April 2011, 08:38 AM | #11 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Real Name: Dan
Location: USA
Watch: This N That
Posts: 34,253
|
Quote:
__________________
When it captures your imagination, that's when you know you have found your passion. Loyal Foot Soldier of The Nylon Nation. Card Carrying Member of the Global Association of Retro-Grouch-Curmudgeons |
|
14 April 2011, 08:54 AM | #12 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Quote:
|
|
14 April 2011, 09:54 AM | #13 | |
Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Real Name: Eric
Location: Minnesota
Watch: TAG Heuer Kirium
Posts: 42
|
Quote:
|
|
14 April 2011, 12:24 PM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Shawn
Location: United States
Watch: SS GMT IIC
Posts: 1,624
|
Not in my area. I went to my AD a week ago and they had a brand new Sub C sitting in the case. I tried it on.......nice!
__________________
Current: SS GMT IIC Former: Panerai 114 Former: Breitling Hercules : |
14 April 2011, 12:33 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Malaysia
Watch: SM300+14060M
Posts: 2,012
|
Interesting 'facts'....maybe those who had sold theirs SubC can tell us what's going on ??
|
14 April 2011, 01:32 PM | #16 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Adam
Location: Orlando, Florida
Watch: Me
Posts: 9,935
|
Quote:
Well I flipped my Sub C and kept the GMT C, I dont know why but I am just loving my GMT and the way it wears on my wrist... I for one like the PCL's too even though I appear to be in the minority
__________________
The richest people in the world look for and build NETWORKS, Everyone else looks for work... Robert Kiyosaki |
|
14 April 2011, 01:37 PM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: Asia
Watch: GMT IIc / SUB C
Posts: 200
|
Had my GMT 2c since july 2009 and bought my Sub C only this year. Just sold it last week. I find the GMT 2c a lot classier and comfortable to wear due to flatter case back. Had a 16610 before my GMT 2c but could not justify the huge price difference between the 16610 and 116610 while they look almost exactly the same.
|
14 April 2011, 02:07 PM | #18 | |||
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2010
Real Name: Nathan
Location: US, Latin America
Watch: GMT IIc 18K/SS
Posts: 3,349
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
__________________
(Member NAWCC since 1976) 116713LN GMT-IIc 18k/SS (Z) + 116520 SS Daytona (M) + 16700 GMT Master (A) + 16610LV Submariner (V) + 16600 Sea Dweller (Z) + 116400 Milgauss White Dial (V) + 70330N Tudor Heritage Chronograph Grey w/Black Sub Dials (J) + 5513 Submariner Serif Dial (5.2 Mil) Who else needs an Intervention? (109 297) (137 237) (73 115) (221) (23) (56) (229) P-Club Member #5 RIP JJ Irani - TRF Legend |
|||
15 April 2011, 05:03 AM | #19 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: Northville, MI,US
Watch: Smstr 600m BigBlue
Posts: 412
|
I can understand the passion of the sub crowd here, but if more Subs are resold, one has to think that the owner of the sub preferred another watch. Same can be said for GMT as well.
So, are the original sales of the GMT that much lower than the Sub? Perception says otherwise. So I'm thinking more of the GMT crowd is just more satisfied with their watch over a longer period. Could it be that more GMT owners just like their watch more than the "comparable" Sub owner? I'm not trying to slam the Sub crowd at all, but this question does get one to think some.
__________________
RedwinGV |
15 April 2011, 05:11 AM | #20 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: The Sea
Posts: 1,894
|
Quote:
If you check archived for-sale posts from around the time of the GMTIIc release I think you'll see the same trend. |
|
15 April 2011, 05:52 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: London
Watch: Quite a few
Posts: 4,315
|
Maybe because the ceramic bezel on the GMT II was quite a different look from the previous two colour bezel which I never liked. Whereas the sub was always a black bezel so just a change of material. I personally love my new GMT II and will never trade it.
But also love the sub too but am going vintage as I love the red subs more :-) |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.