ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

tlbarrs · 19 July 2012, 03:12 AM

Has anyone got a picture of a Sub non date next to a Daytona, if you have would you please post it on here for me please I would like to try and compare the Daytona size wise to my Sub thanks guys.

beshannon · 19 July 2012, 03:32 AM

Both 40mm

RICARDOVASCO · 19 July 2012, 03:40 AM

I had both, Submariner date and Daytona SS ( my sub was stollen). The sub looks bigger because the bezel color, IMO.

azguy · 19 July 2012, 03:55 AM

I think the Daytona wears a tad bigger than the 14060 even though they are the same size IMHO.

tlbarrs · 19 July 2012, 04:46 AM

Thanks guys, i am toying with the idea off making the Daytona my next purchase that or the LVC Sub.

esm · 19 July 2012, 05:01 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by azguy

I think the Daytona wears a tad bigger than the 14060 even though they are the same size IMHO.

i think its the reverse.
the Sub wears bigger than a Daytona, due to the rotating bezel

gazp · 19 July 2012, 05:03 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by esm

i think its the reverse.
the Sub wears bigger than a Daytona, due to the rotating bezel

I think the sub wears bigger due to the hollow centre links

tlbarrs · 19 July 2012, 06:23 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by beshannon

Both 40mm

Thanks for taking the time to upload the picture for me it's most appreciated. And may I say your Sub and Daytona look stunning.

rohardi · 19 July 2012, 07:14 AM

The Sub (ESPECIALLY a Sub C) feels much bigger even though they are both 40mm. The Sub is much thicker than a Daytona.

Mickey® · 19 July 2012, 07:38 AM

Every time I tried on a Daytona (White) it felt very small compared to either 14060M or 16610LV...Kinda like a Explorer...but a tad smaller.

77T · 19 July 2012, 07:57 AM

Had them both for some years (traded/flipped long ago). Either seemed alike to my eyes as they were rotated daily. I agree the white dialed Daytona seemed optically smaller than the TT Panda dial. Must be an illusion since all 3 were identical 40mm

beshannon · 19 July 2012, 08:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by tlbarrs

Thanks for taking the time to upload the picture for me it's most appreciated. And may I say your Sub and Daytona look stunning.

No problem, here are a few more

19 July 2012, 03:12 AM	#1
tlbarrs "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Mark Location: uk Derbyshire Posts: 434	Daytona size compared to Sub. Has anyone got a picture of a Sub non date next to a Daytona, if you have would you please post it on here for me please I would like to try and compare the Daytona size wise to my Sub thanks guys.

19 July 2012, 03:32 AM	#2
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	Both 40mm __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

19 July 2012, 07:57 AM	#11
77T 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Dec 2010 Real Name: PaulG Location: Georgia Posts: 41,934	Had them both for some years (traded/flipped long ago). Either seemed alike to my eyes as they were rotated daily. I agree the white dialed Daytona seemed optically smaller than the TT Panda dial. Must be an illusion since all 3 were identical 40mm __________________ Does anyone really know what time it is?

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

19 July 2012, 03:40 AM	#3
RICARDOVASCO "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: Ricardo Location: Brasil Posts: 248	I had both, Submariner date and Daytona SS ( my sub was stollen). The sub looks bigger because the bezel color, IMO.

19 July 2012, 03:55 AM	#4
azguy Banned Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: ------- Location: ------- Watch: --------- Posts: 12,609	I think the Daytona wears a tad bigger than the 14060 even though they are the same size IMHO.

19 July 2012, 04:46 AM	#5
tlbarrs "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2012 Real Name: Mark Location: uk Derbyshire Posts: 434	Thanks guys, i am toying with the idea off making the Daytona my next purchase that or the LVC Sub.

19 July 2012, 07:14 AM	#9
rohardi "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2010 Location: Rhode Island USA Watch: 116610LN, 216570 Posts: 787	The Sub (ESPECIALLY a Sub C) feels much bigger even though they are both 40mm. The Sub is much thicker than a Daytona.

19 July 2012, 07:38 AM	#10
Mickey® Banned Join Date: Aug 2011 Real Name: Mickey® Location: Atlanta, GA Watch: Swiss Made Posts: 5,801	Every time I tried on a Daytona (White) it felt very small compared to either 14060M or 16610LV...Kinda like a Explorer...but a tad smaller.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)