ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
28 September 2012, 04:16 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
Keep the old Sub, put it in your safe deposit box at the bank. Forget about for ten years, sell it when it's worth even more money.
I would also take a close look at the gmtII-c, as it has the best wrist presence in my opinion.
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
28 September 2012, 04:37 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Watch: Sub 116610LN
Posts: 73
|
New sub!
|
28 September 2012, 04:47 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: New Jersey
Watch: 114060
Posts: 1,139
|
Keep old sub and wear it on NATO strap for weekends, buy a new sports model sub, gmt, or exp. 1.
|
28 September 2012, 04:57 AM | #34 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2006
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: COMEX 1665
Posts: 2,830
|
I'd keep the old sub too ...
|
28 September 2012, 05:36 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Chris
Location: Mass
Watch: Rolex Sub & SD 43
Posts: 195
|
While the GMT II is a great looking watch, I'd destroy the PCL and clasp in a week. I desk drive to much.
I do have a Nato strap just sitting... I did think of putting the old one in the safe and selling it for more in a few years. Guess I'll just have to try one on and then decide. I'd be in no rush to sell the old sub. If I went with a new one, I can see what I think in a few months after wearing it. So it would seem the consensus is to get the new one vs just keeping (wearing) the old one? |
28 September 2012, 05:56 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: UK
Posts: 2,205
|
I had a 1998 Coke GMT as my first, then bought a DSSD two years ago, followed by a Hulk three months ago. I love the Glidelock, ceramic bezels etc and hardly wore the GMT for 18 months. Now I find myself wearing it more and more. It has a different feel to my modern ones and I would now regret if I'd got rid of it.
As many have suggested, keep the old sub, get a new one and if later you find you don't wear the old one you can sell it. I also agree with the comment to get a Hulk!!!!!! |
28 September 2012, 06:06 AM | #37 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
|
I would keep the old.
|
28 September 2012, 06:08 AM | #38 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Michael
Location: NYC
Watch: 16610,1675, 116518
Posts: 363
|
Look - who cares what other people say. You're tired of it - sell it.
|
28 September 2012, 06:11 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Chris
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,984
|
I think the clasp on the new sub is just so darn great. I'd do it.
__________________
Lead by example through production. |
28 September 2012, 06:34 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Joe
Location: PA
Posts: 14,774
|
Both are awesome watches, but I prefer the C.
Sent from my iPad2 using Tapatalk |
28 September 2012, 07:31 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Real Name: Mark
Location: Toronto, Canada.
Watch: SD / LV / Daytona
Posts: 2,089
|
Keep the old Submariner, what are you going to wear when the new one goes to the Spa ?
|
28 September 2012, 11:56 AM | #42 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Brian
Location: Chicagoland
Watch: ing the markets
Posts: 2,194
|
I did this very same thing, no regrets. Sell it and get the Sub C
__________________
126600 SD43 Red 126710BLRO GMT II PEPSI 178274 Midsize DJ Rhodium/Roman- Hers 126334 DJ41 in blue, fluted, on jubilee 116509 Daytona WG Panda 114060 Sub no date 126621 YM Chocolate dial Root Beer 126710BLNR Batman 126613LB Bluesy 126711CHNR GMT II Root Beer |
28 September 2012, 03:22 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Stuart
Location: Dubai
Watch: IWC Mark XV
Posts: 280
|
Noooo! Keep it. You're well on your way to having a vintage sub, one owner from new. Just stick it out for a few more years.
|
28 September 2012, 04:16 PM | #44 |
Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Italy
Posts: 128
|
The Sub-C is better!
|
28 September 2012, 04:23 PM | #45 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Ron
Location: US
Watch: 118206/SD
Posts: 431
|
It's a Keeper IMHO ...
I hate to say it but Rolex really loses me with the newest line. I really prefer the Day-Date I as well. Maybe my smaller wrist dictates but the latest models are just too "in your face" for my taste. Cheers -Ronbo
|
28 September 2012, 04:27 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Michigan
Watch: Rolex/Omega/Brtlg
Posts: 461
|
You might as well sell to get the subC, cause when you get it, you won't wear the old one...that's what happened to me. New one is very substantial in comparison.
EricE
__________________
EricE Watch addict Michigan |
28 September 2012, 05:09 PM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Will Zdorf
Location: So. Cal.
Watch: SDC4000, Sub LVC
Posts: 1,944
|
Been here, done that. I absolutely love the new Sub C's...almost as much as I love my holes series 16610. But, i dont love my Sub C nearly as much as I miss the 16610 I bought new in 2000 and sold for a Sub C to start the process of this madness to begin with.
Now, if you followed this, what I am trying to say is: absolutely keep the old one for sentimental reasons, but buy the new one. If after a year or two your not missing the old one at all, sell it. Even better, buy the Hulk, and you will have two amazing watches that I promise you will won't ever want to get rid of! |
28 September 2012, 06:03 PM | #48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Clive
Location: Exoplanet
Watch: spring-driven
Posts: 38,856
|
Putting aside emotional/sentimental considerations, I much prefer the current Sub Date 116610
The bracelet and clasp feel like 'real engineering' and the maxi dial is nice (especially with blue lume). The watch is still 40 mm but certainly has more 'presence' than the old 16610 If you want something a little larger, perhaps also consider the Explorer II (42 mm) and the Deepsea. The GMT II C is also very nice (still at 40 mm)
__________________
|
28 September 2012, 07:54 PM | #49 |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,504
|
So do I
I did the same thing also. The 16610 is a great watch but for me, I prefer the 116610. No regrets here either
__________________
JJ |
28 September 2012, 09:14 PM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: alabang
Posts: 211
|
if i were in your position.... i wouldnt sell my old sub for subc... but if i dont have at all in the 1st place.... i will get the new and improved subc...
|
28 September 2012, 11:13 PM | #51 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
|
wearing a SubC right now. I have got to say that I am really loving it.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
28 September 2012, 11:16 PM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2007
Real Name: Trevor
Location: Arizona
Posts: 5,740
|
If your wrist is a bit larger, why not get the 42mm Explorer II. I have had both and much prefer the Explorer II over the new Subs.
__________________
My grails: |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.