The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 10 October 2012, 06:35 PM   #1
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
SD- T-dial or Luminova?

hi,

got a chance to buy either one.

one is circa 1997
one is circa 2000

one tritium dial, the other SLuminova

cost about the same, b/p for both.


Go for the SL? or ...
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 06:50 PM   #2
mikkolopez
"TRF" Member
 
mikkolopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
Given the choice I would go for the Tritium dial as it is more rare than the SL dial.

Anyways the age difference is 3 years so the movement and watch age are roughly same but the T-dial is cut out to be a collector dial.

I had the same dilemma with an Explorer 2, I went with the T-dial below because the Tritium patina is starting to show. If you are into patina-ed (vintaged) lume then a T-dial is for you.
mikkolopez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 06:52 PM   #3
mikkolopez
"TRF" Member
 
mikkolopez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Philippines
Posts: 2,301
Oh sorry here is the pic
__________________
At my age now ...
I have SEEN everything,
I have HEARD everything,
I have even DONE everything,
I just don't REMEMBER everything.
mikkolopez is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 06:58 PM   #4
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
Cool!
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 07:06 PM   #5
padi56
"TRF" Life Patron
 
padi56's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Real Name: Peter
Location: Llanfairpwllgwyng
Watch: ing you.
Posts: 53,031
Quote:
Originally Posted by polarinda View Post
hi,

got a chance to buy either one.

one is circa 1997
one is circa 2000

one tritium dial, the other SLuminova

cost about the same, b/p for both.


Go for the SL? or ...
Myself would buy on condition its very doubtful if any modern day SD will become hugely collectible.The SD like most of the modern Rolex range have not changed a lot since introduction of the 3 series movements in 1988.Yes they changed the lume from Tritium to Luminover around 1998 so in years wise there will be as many Tritium as Luminover .And apart from a non lug hole cases, a few minor fonts over the years.plus the different case serials they are all basically the same.But its possible in perhaps 20-30 years time because some Tritium dials get a patina these could be the more collectible out of the two. Its swings and roundabouts and a 2000 watch will be Luminover if it has just Swiss bottom of dial.
__________________

ICom Pro3

All posts are my own opinion and my opinion only.

"The clock of life is wound but once, and no man has the power to tell just when the hands will stop. Now is the only time you actually own the time, Place no faith in time, for the clock may soon be still for ever."
Good Judgement comes from experience,experience comes from Bad Judgement,.Buy quality, cry once; buy cheap, cry again and again.

www.mc0yad.club

Second in command CEO and left handed watch winder
padi56 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 07:52 PM   #6
Pete17
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Pete17's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Real Name: Pete
Location: Base Camp
Posts: 627
Neither SD is close to being rare.

Get the one YOU like.
Main differences will be that one has lug holes and next to zero luminosity and the other will have clean lugs and glow nicely.

Purely personal taste.

Good luck with your decision, either way you can't go wrong.

Sent from my Droid.
__________________
Take care
Pete
Pete17 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 10:10 PM   #7
xjeeunitx
2024 Pledge Member
 
xjeeunitx's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 5,462
SL for me.
xjeeunitx is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 10:18 PM   #8
Jake B
"TRF" Member
 
Jake B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN
Posts: 2,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pete17 View Post

Main differences will be that one has lug holes and next to zero luminosity and the other will have clean lugs and glow nicely.

Sent from my Droid.
Both will have lug holes...
__________________
Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.
Jake B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 10:19 PM   #9
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
both have lug holes.

Im leaning towards the T as there's a chance the markers would go darker or something. Im not into lume, so nothing to look forward to with the SL.

Maybe the notion that a T dial is more collectable is a myth, ,since so many of them were produced.
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 10:23 PM   #10
Jake B
"TRF" Member
 
Jake B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN
Posts: 2,820
I was just faced with the same decision, and you can see my choice in my post about my new P series. As PADI said, neither one is more rare than the other really, and with the choices narrowed down to being between a Trit dial example from around 1997, and a SL dial one from 2000, I went for slightly newer SL model, since the only real difference was that the 2000 one was a bit newer, had a dial that still glows, and isn't unnecessarily containing radioactive paint that doesn't glow anymore.
__________________
Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.
Jake B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 10 October 2012, 10:28 PM   #11
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
good choice you made. No right or wrong answers i guess.

I once saw a 1995 SD with tritium that were cracking on the hands. Not totally fallen off but hanging in there.

what a sight!
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2012, 12:31 AM   #12
Frogman4me
Banned
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Maryland
Posts: 6,268
For me Tritium all day.
Frogman4me is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2012, 02:29 AM   #13
Len
"TRF" Member
 
Len's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Real Name: Hans Henrik
Location: EU, Denmark
Posts: 184
I went for an T-dial. I like the patina it will have over time. Mine is the last T dial series (U - series).




Len is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2012, 02:31 AM   #14
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Trav,

I have to agree with padi. Condition would be the key for me. As to the dial circa 2000 might be luminova as opposed to superluminova. Luminosity might not be all that great.

Given that and condition being equal tritium might be the better choice down the road, but again as padi said how much is open for debate.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2012, 02:37 AM   #15
springbar
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2010
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Watch: 116400GV
Posts: 834
Get the Luminova

I'm surprised amidst this talk of production numbers and collectibility nobody has mentioned _function_.

By now, any late-'90s tritium dial is no more than half as bright as it was when new and they're getting dimmer every day. I would get the Luminova dial if you want to use the watch in the dark in the future.
springbar is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 11 October 2012, 02:44 AM   #16
Jake B
"TRF" Member
 
Jake B's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Hong Kong
Watch: Gold Sub 116618LN
Posts: 2,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by springbar View Post
I'm surprised amidst this talk of production numbers and collectibility nobody has mentioned _function_.

By now, any late-'90s tritium dial is no more than half as bright as it was when new and they're getting dimmer every day. I would get the Luminova dial if you want to use the watch in the dark in the future.
Exactly. There's a small space, where SL dials were used with lug holes, and that's where I found my happy place, and, they are actually, probably, the most rare of the modern SD...I looked at hundreds of SD over the past year before settling on mine.
__________________
Things are more like they are now than they ever were before.
Jake B is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 12 October 2012, 11:28 AM   #17
polarinda
"TRF" Member
 
polarinda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Real Name: Trav
Location: singapore
Watch: it
Posts: 2,316
Bought the t dial U series.b/p..serviced..

Pics tonight..
polarinda is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC

OCWatches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.