ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
18 October 2012, 01:01 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: somewhere
Posts: 210
|
5146R or 5127R? Which would you choose?
Hello,
Which would you recommend as a next watch purchase - 5127R or 5146R? Just posted on another forum but wanted to see what you guys think. I know everyone here likes the complications, in that sense these 2 can't be compared. However, I am mainly concerned in style and aesthetics of these 2 watches. Something that will look stylish and not dates many years to come. Say, Patek 5035 (previous model to 5146) does look dates and not so appealing to me. I am afraid that 5146 might do the same in the future. But, may be I am wrong. Of course the same can happen to 5127. Thanks! |
18 October 2012, 03:26 AM | #2 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: Platona
Posts: 1,569
|
I personally own the 5127.....and LOVE it! At the time of purchase I was considering the 5146 as well, but decided against it in favor of the more simple 5127. Although complications are nice to have and neat to look at, they can present their own issues and challenges. For instance, setting it after it stops running can be tedious, the additional parts theoretically can result in higher maintenance costs, etc. In the end, I just decided that it wasn't worth it and opted for the cleaner 5127.
Both pieces are amazing for sure. In the end, it will be simply a matter of which smiles at you the most. Can't go wrong either way in this instance! |
18 October 2012, 03:41 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
5127 is the futureproof classic
5146 i'm not sold on... Should you ever need to shift one of them the calatrava might be easier and also at a price closer to what you paid... you can't go wrong with either though Sent from my GT-I9100
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
18 October 2012, 06:02 AM | #4 |
Member
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: London
Watch: PP AP RM
Posts: 794
|
If you can spend the extra 5146 is a classic Patek and unless you paying less then retail the Calatrava you will be waiting a long time for to get your money back.
|
18 October 2012, 07:25 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
I would get the 5146 in a heartbeat.
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
18 October 2012, 07:55 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: Boston
Posts: 3,177
|
5127. Something odd about the 5146.
Style and aesthetics the 5127 has it - there are other Patek complications than the 5146 that I'd look at if you can afford it.
__________________
"Oh, you give a f****' aspirin a headache, pal!" |
18 October 2012, 08:34 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: somewhere
Posts: 210
|
which...
other Patek complications within 50K would you suggest besides 5146?
|
18 October 2012, 08:43 AM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Real Name: Adam
Location: Ontario, Canada
Watch: Pepsi.
Posts: 5,749
|
Go with the 5127R. I think it's a timeless classic. The 5146R looks a little odd to me as well.
__________________
- Adam Instagram: @GMTSUBTIME |
18 October 2012, 08:55 AM | #9 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,991
|
5146 for sure!
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
18 October 2012, 09:02 AM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: Carl
Location: Always moving
Watch: If you wish...
Posts: 22,039
|
There Ken, I corrected it...
__________________
Mon corps c'est un pays en guerre sur l'point d'finir, Le général de l'armée de terre s'attend au pire, J'ai faim, j'ai frette, je suis trop faible pour me lever debout, On va hisser le drapeau blanc un point c'est tout. - André Fortin |
18 October 2012, 09:05 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: somewhere
Posts: 210
|
well, that is the case with 5146 too if you buy it at MSRP, it will be a long time till you get you money back
|
18 October 2012, 09:12 AM | #12 |
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Ken
Location: SW Florida
Watch: One on my wrist.
Posts: 63,991
|
__________________
SPEM SUCCESSUS ALIT |
18 October 2012, 09:15 AM | #13 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Jul 2009
Real Name: Tony Geha
Location: San Diego, CA
Watch: Yacht-Master
Posts: 51,002
|
5146R all the way
__________________
Instagram @JustRolexes 2FA security active |
18 October 2012, 10:00 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: John
Location: US
Posts: 10
|
Both are awesome watches of course but I personally like the 5146R a bit better. I would say just get both :D
|
25 October 2012, 06:08 PM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Thailand
Watch: 116610 LN
Posts: 33
|
I would go with 5146R
|
26 October 2012, 06:06 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2008
Real Name: Tony
Location: England
Posts: 5,449
|
I have had the honour of owning & wearing the 5146J & G and cannot fault them. In fact at the time I loved them both.
Recently I have been looking at the 5127R. And think that it is one of the most beautiful looking watch. As an everyday wear with the screw down crown/caseback & shoulders it has to be the 5127. As a complicated piece the 5146 would be my choice. But going by your avatar, I think that you have already made your decision :)
__________________
|
27 October 2012, 04:18 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Howard100/101
Posts: 656
|
I am a bit bias here..
Honestly, go look at both if you can in person. Pictures online don't do either justice. Try them each on.. look at them.. see which one you feel fits you best. Then enjoy! |
27 October 2012, 06:56 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: united kingdom
Posts: 445
|
I think the 5127 definitely looks a bit more modern but I can see most watch lovers will prefer a PP watch with complications.
Why not go for the 5296R which looks absolutely stunning and classy in rose gold! |
27 October 2012, 07:13 AM | #19 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: North Shore
Posts: 1,116
|
Have you considered....
Quote:
Functionally, there is a 'skeleton' hand beneath the hour hand which is deployed by depressing the push-buttons on the left side of the case. The skeleton hand tracks your "home time" while the regular hour hand can be set to local time where you are traveling. The dial at the top is a '24 hour' dial which-- in correspondence with the skeleton hand-- tracks whether it is a.m. or p.m. in your home time zone. Really cool complication-- sort of a sister watch to the World Time which shares the same Calatrava case-- and useful for those who travel between time zones. The 5134 has the classic Patek 215 manual wind movement. It winds like butter (with a safety mechanism to prevent over-winding). It is also more rarely seen that either the 5127 or the 5146, which makes it a little more interesting IMO. Earlier versions of this watch-- with the push button dual time controls-- have brought significant prices at auction because, like the 5134, they didn't make that many of them. |
|
6 November 2012, 03:50 PM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Southern CA.
Watch: JLC~AP~RLX~PAM~UN
Posts: 360
|
Calendar...by far! I even like the actual case better
Im actually not much of a PP fan, but I like the set up of the calendar, date, moon, power reserve, date and arabic numbers on this model. This is one of those few 'busy' watches that work really well! 5206 is an awesome looking watch as well, have you considered that one? |
6 November 2012, 04:08 PM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,553
|
dont' know which is which but i have no use for a moon phase and do not want to spend more than 30 seconds setting a watch....
so simpler one for me
__________________
|
6 November 2012, 08:37 PM | #22 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
have you made a decision?
i love the 5127... stunning classic
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
6 November 2012, 09:24 PM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: CT
Watch: 116610LN
Posts: 160
|
5146. My obtainable grail. Some day.
|
6 November 2012, 10:53 PM | #24 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Earth
Posts: 948
|
|
7 November 2012, 12:50 AM | #25 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: Justin
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,307
|
|
7 November 2012, 01:45 AM | #26 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Real Name: Kyung
Location: Anywhere?
Watch: cha want...
Posts: 4,488
|
How about the 5396R?
|
8 November 2012, 04:57 AM | #27 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Brian
Location: Cleveland, OH
Watch: Platona
Posts: 1,569
|
I'm a little biased as well. My vote is for the simplicity of the 5127. Really is no "wrong" answer here though.
|
8 November 2012, 05:04 AM | #28 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
i dream of 5127 well 5107 ,,, nearly the same thing ,,,, so it has my vote.
|
8 November 2012, 05:10 AM | #29 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
|
oh , but id like it on the bracelet please ,,,,lol
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.