|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
19 March 2013, 11:14 PM
|
#1 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
Gmt-1675 ????
Hey, want to buy one of them, GMT 1675, both are from 1978 also almost the same price. Which do you think is better? Thanks for answers, help. Regards Paradis
__________________
|
|
|
|
19 March 2013, 11:17 PM
|
#2 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,715
|
Do you have a better picture of the one on the left?
Service history, if known? |
|
|
|
|
19 March 2013, 11:23 PM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
No, unfortunately, the left is 5 milj.serie. in Swerige, the second image, at the watches.uk ......!
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
19 March 2013, 11:26 PM
|
#4 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,715
|
Dial on the left looks suspect, possibly redone. Crown does not look right.
I would prefer to see a better picture. I am sure others will chime in... |
|
|
|
|
19 March 2013, 11:27 PM
|
#5 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2010
Real Name: Paradis
Location: Sweden
Watch: Sub.1680/ Datejust
Posts: 885
|
Just got two pictures ....
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
19 March 2013, 11:30 PM
|
#6 |
|
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: North Florida
Posts: 16,715
|
Dial may be ok. Perhaps the crystal is making it look distorted.
Obviously, the mag bubble is huge...possibly aftermarket.. |
|
|
|
|
20 March 2013, 12:17 AM
|
#7 |
|
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Real Name: Aaron
Location: CT/NYC
Watch: ing the time!
Posts: 6,987
|
Tough to tell with just these photos, and there are so many other factors. Have you seen movement photos, for example? Any service history? However, just based on these photos, I think the one with the faded bezel insert is nicer. The other one looks as if it might have newer hands that don't match the dial. (Could just the the angle of the camera, though.) Good luck either way.
|
|
|
|
|
20 March 2013, 12:43 AM
|
#8 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: USA
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 794
|
I like the one with the faded dial with a chunk of metal missing from the bezel because the hands & dial look original.
Good luck deciding... 
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
