ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
1 March 2013, 03:31 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Plano, TX
Watch: Explorer 1
Posts: 60
|
I think most of the people who are skeptical about the 114060 are those who prefer the older versions because they grew up with that -- nothing wrong with that, people are usually more attached to things they've grown accustomed to over the years and are more skeptical to change.
That being said, I would've gotten the 114060 without question if it weren't for the Explorer I 214270. I think new submariner owners, unless they like vintage stuff, should and probably usually goes for the new 114060 over the 14060m....the upgrades make it worth it! |
1 March 2013, 03:32 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 195
|
I got no complaints so far...
I like the fat lugs, chunkier case, updated bracelet and maxi dial and hands. Only complaint would be the price... lol |
1 March 2013, 05:53 PM | #33 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,844
|
I absolutely love my D Serial 14060 and will never flip it for the new one, HOWEVER if I had never seen the older models I would think the new one was just great. I love the glossy intensity of the ceramic bezel and the quality of the new bracelet and clasp. I can see that the new case and dail is more 'contemporary' even though I maybe enjoy the 'elegance' of the old style. I get the feeling that younger people will like the 'chunkiness' of the new model better. It's all about your personal taste, isn't it.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch. Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..." |
1 March 2013, 08:02 PM | #34 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,419
|
I love the 114060! I always had an appreciation for the 14060, but once Rolex added the upgrades.... Perfect.
|
1 March 2013, 10:32 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
Thanks
|
1 March 2013, 10:34 PM | #36 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
wow
This was very elegantly stated...thank you. I think the decision has been made. Just one more trip to a AD to try it on again...i will keep you posted.
Quote:
|
|
1 March 2013, 10:43 PM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Clark
Location: Ramsey Minnesota
Watch: GMT Master II
Posts: 954
|
Love mine!!!Run it with a Nato most of the time,,,just wish it had HOLES!!
__________________
GMT Master II 126300 41 White stick smooth Explorer 39mm SOLD ,, 114060 SOLD NIB Sub ND SOLD,,Shouldn't have!!!Crap! |
1 March 2013, 11:24 PM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Detroit Michigan
Watch: 18078
Posts: 1,142
|
When It comes down to comfort the 14060 is the winner ! When you forget you have a watch on that's comfort. I had a subc so I'm not just blowing you no what 1
|
6 March 2013, 03:55 AM | #39 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Norwell, MA
Posts: 134
|
I love the ceramic. As soon as I saw the Sub-C (either date or no date), the old submariner just looked dated to me. It's still a stunning watch, but I dig the ceramic. Especially how it shines. given that I absolutely love DJ, it's not surprising that I prefer the ceramic Subs.
__________________
My pet peeve: People asking others what watch he/she should buy. |
6 March 2013, 12:45 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Real Name: steve
Location: sydney
Watch: SMURF
Posts: 653
|
i absolutely love my 114060.
it is so fantastic i never take it off. i dont regulate it at all (though i will now i've learnt how to) and i reckon it runs something like -0.5 s per day. and thats out of the box. re: price i bought grey and got one for less than $6,500 AUD. i'm thrilled with that. re: negative comments i can't say i've seen many, although re: new rolex's there certainly are some who have no love for the lug's etc. i hear people saying the new design is chunky and maybe it is in comparison to the older cases. the best take i have seen on the aesthetics of the 114060 so far is a blog post on 100% rolex. well worth checking out. i especially like his emphasis on the idea that the 114060 is the natural progression of the 5513. for example i like the way there is a contrast between the bracelet width and the lug width. a flash back to pre 14060 models apparently, but that is one of the things i see criticised by some. |
9 March 2013, 03:00 AM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Martin
Location: Home
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 92
|
The 114060 is perfect! Delighted with mine
|
9 March 2013, 03:03 AM | #42 | |
Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1665 Sea-Dweller
Posts: 64
|
Quote:
I love mine. Beats the 14060(m) hands down. Edit: ... and I'm a vintage guy on the whole, having two 1665 Sea-Dwellers, and have owned several 5513, etc. And I still much prefer the 114060 over the 14060m which I had previously. |
|
9 March 2013, 03:13 AM | #43 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
Update: I did it..arriving on the 22nd
Thanks for all the support! |
9 March 2013, 09:48 AM | #44 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 47,598
|
Great choice. Look forward to seeing it.
|
9 March 2013, 09:51 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: NC, USA
Posts: 681
|
Absolutely love mine.
__________________
Instagram: dukerules |
9 March 2013, 01:56 PM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: 88 keys
Posts: 2,241
|
It's an amazingly simple and beautiful watch.
|
9 March 2013, 02:00 PM | #47 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
|
I wish I had one. Love it.
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
9 March 2013, 02:00 PM | #48 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2011
Real Name: Seth
Location: nj
Watch: Omega
Posts: 24,827
|
__________________
If happiness is a state of mind, why look anywhere else for it? IG: gsmotorclub IG: thesawcollection (Both mostly just car stuff) |
27 March 2013, 10:12 AM | #49 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
Update: thought I might add my new acquisition to my thread. love it
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013 Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967 Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007 Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985 Sold but wish I didn't Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972 |
27 March 2013, 10:45 AM | #50 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: GMT -5
Watch: Rolex/Panerai
Posts: 991
|
Congrats, looks great on you.
|
27 March 2013, 10:57 AM | #51 |
⭐⭐⭐⭐
2024 SubLV41 Sponsor & Boutique Seller Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Aamir
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Watch: Patek, Rolex
Posts: 34,386
|
Congrats. It looks really nice. I'm glad I own one of these beauties. Absolutely awesome watch
|
27 March 2013, 11:10 AM | #52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
|
the 114060 is so awesome, the perfect symmetry is unbeatable. if I could afford to own it with all my others it would be a must have. I guarantee that the 114060 will stand the test of time and be a true classic among all the new Rolexes.
|
27 March 2013, 12:13 PM | #53 | ||
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Ed
Location: Martha's Vineyard
Posts: 835
|
Thank you ! I am really happy with it
Quote:
Quote:
and all this chatter about lug size and boxy just misses the point. The watch continues to evolve and gets more substantial. IMHO it hasnt been a "tool" watch since jaques cousteau was paying about $200 for them. I find things to like in each generation of subs, and as well looking back find things not as great. The early bracelets coveted for being vintage but are tinny compared to today's - there is no comparison. Today's bracelet is amazing A 70 s bracelet is cool, maybe hard to find but not amazing I don't really care what other people think but I do wish the folks who disparage this model would give it a chance..if you a a sub lover there is nothing NOT to embrace about this version..I think it will be viewed very fondly in years to come Just my 2 cents..professing my admiration Of this fine watch
__________________
Rolex Submariner 114060 - 2013 Rolex Explorer 1016 - 1967 Omega Seamaster 2220.80 2007 Victorinox Swiss Army 24221 - circa 1985 Sold but wish I didn't Rolex DateJust 1603 - 1972 |
||
27 March 2013, 11:35 PM | #54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: USA
Watch: SubC LV
Posts: 1,821
|
Love it. Simple and classic.
Didn't get much attention. I think it was considered "an expected update" of the more popular brother 116610LN! |
28 March 2013, 12:07 AM | #55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2011
Location: Austin, Texas
Watch: HULK SMASH
Posts: 584
|
I think it's a fantastic looking reference. Frankly I prefer all the upgrades on it versus the previous generation. I will say though, I prefer the case design of the 14060 if you want to wear your sub with other straps. I'm not a big fan of the new maxicase on leather/nato etc, but absolutely love it on the bracelet.
|
28 March 2013, 06:47 AM | #56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Liverpool
Watch: Rolex Sub 114060
Posts: 23
|
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.