ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

MilgaussMan1 · 25 April 2013, 01:33 PM

41.5 is wish!

SUBversive · 25 April 2013, 01:43 PM

Whoa. Knocked it out of the park. I need a bigger wrist and way bigger bank account....

applebook · 26 April 2013, 02:45 AM

OK, when I first saw this stock photo, I was "meh," but after seeing the live pics in the other Basel thread, my jaw has dropped for this.

applebook · 26 April 2013, 02:46 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by MP5

Smokes the Pam ceramics, there I said it.

Are the Panerai ceramics injected or solid like this one?

Greenp · 26 April 2013, 03:34 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by applebook

Are the Panerai ceramics injected or solid like this one?

I read that it is supposedly milled from a solid block of ceramic.

http://www.watch-insider.com/news/om...selworld-2013/

KellyM3 · 26 April 2013, 12:31 PM

It is beautiful

jimmytim · 27 April 2013, 01:10 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Greenp

I read that it is supposedly milled from a solid block of ceramic.

http://www.watch-insider.com/news/om...selworld-2013/

Looks lovely

Isn't it 42mm?

The speedy 57 is and they both look the same size from the back

SUBversive · 27 April 2013, 11:13 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by jimmytim

Looks lovely

Isn't it 42mm?

The speedy 57 is and they both look the same size from the back

Thought this was 44mm?

anothernewphone · 27 April 2013, 11:38 AM

44.25

Kelly's · 27 April 2013, 02:53 PM

Video looks good too: http://www.youtube.com/embed/Ve170QmBHNE

10.000 Swiss francs...

jimmytim · 27 April 2013, 04:24 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by anothernewphone

44.25

Damn, too big for me, even though I wear a pam 111

Cru Jones · 28 April 2013, 06:34 AM

the more i see, the more i like. two major stumbling blocks: thickness and price. the domed sapphire underneath just seems like a mistake, causing the watch to be too thick and to float on the wrist. have to see it in real life.

another issue is the chemical formula on the dial. probably subtle in real life, but, not something "positive".

otherwise, niiiiiice.

some pix below, with a write up and video available if you click here.

26 April 2013, 02:45 AM	#33
applebook "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2007 Location: vancouver Posts: 1,918	OK, when I first saw this stock photo, I was "meh," but after seeing the live pics in the other Basel thread, my jaw has dropped for this. __________________

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

25 April 2013, 01:33 PM	#31
MilgaussMan1 Member Join Date: Nov 2012 Location: Signapore Posts: 196	41.5 is wish!

25 April 2013, 01:43 PM	#32
SUBversive Banned Join Date: May 2011 Location: ri Watch: Sun Dial Posts: 14,346	Whoa. Knocked it out of the park. I need a bigger wrist and way bigger bank account....

26 April 2013, 12:31 PM	#36
KellyM3 Banned Join Date: Jan 2013 Location: Attleboro mass Posts: 209	It is beautiful

27 April 2013, 11:38 AM	#39
anothernewphone Banned Join Date: Feb 2013 Real Name: Bill Location: Plymouth Meeting Watch: 116520 Posts: 3,209	44.25

27 April 2013, 02:53 PM	#40
Kelly's "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Saskatchewan Posts: 26	Video looks good too: http://www.youtube.com/embed/Ve170QmBHNE 10.000 Swiss francs...

28 April 2013, 06:34 AM	#42
Cru Jones 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Location: Paris, France Posts: 35,273	the more i see, the more i like. two major stumbling blocks: thickness and price. the domed sapphire underneath just seems like a mistake, causing the watch to be too thick and to float on the wrist. have to see it in real life. another issue is the chemical formula on the dial. probably subtle in real life, but, not something "positive". otherwise, niiiiiice. some pix below, with a write up and video available if you click here.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)