Which one is the most comfortable: Sub or Sub-C?

[FTX I]

Is the 5 digit Sub more confortable then the Sub-C? Are there less sharp edges? Im considering another Sub and was sure that the NDc was the right one but now Im also looking at the non ceramic ones and would like to have info on comfort. Other issue is that I always heard that guys with small wrists (mine is 6.75) can have problems to adjust the 5 digit Sub bracelet and sometimes they have to remove a permanent link and I also worry about that. I wear my Sub-C with 4 links at 6oclock and 4 + half link at 12 and the fit is perfect. I wonder if I can get a perfect fit like that on the 5 digit one as I dont have info regarding the clasp size on the new and on the 5 digit. Thanks for reading. Any thoughts will be much appreciated.

[captkevin]

I have same size wrist. I don't find either one is more comfortable than the other. I guess the 5 digit is less noticeable in feel

[FTX I]

Originally Posted by captkevin

I have same size wrist. I don't find either one is more comfortable than the other. I guess the 5 digit is less noticeable in feel

When you sized it you had the same perfect fit? no need to remove link or anything like that? Thanks a lot.

[Broker Boy]

The 16610 is lighter, but I get a better fit from the glidelock on my 116610 -- especially as my wrist size changes during the day.

I don't think I'd recommend adding an older sub. You won't wear it.

[Rolexitis]

I've got 4 links at 6 o'clock and 5 at 12. What difference would 4 + half link at 12 make while having the glide lock? Does it have any impact?

[Rolexitis]

Btw I've worn both and I can't say I can tell a difference in one being more comfy than the other. I love my 114060 without a doubt though.

[accce]

16610 is more comfortable.

[FTX I]

Originally Posted by Rolexitis

I've got 4 links at 6 o'clock and 5 at 12. What difference would 4 + half link at 12 make while having the glide lock? Does it have any impact?

we talked about that on the other thread. you may be right, and probably no difference, but as I said my clasp is perfectly centered and I just guessed the half link at 12 would be the answer, but I can be wrong tho.

[FTX I]

Originally Posted by Broker Boy

I don't think I'd recommend adding an older sub. You won't wear it.

thanks for the input.

[FTX I]

Originally Posted by accce

16610 is more comfortable.

Thanks.

[SLS]

For the most comfortable Sub, try a 5513 or 1680 (if you need a date) and you will be sold...by far the most comfortable Subs out there. JMO!
Scott

[kilyung]

Both are different watches but equally comfortable if fitted properly.

[Rolexitis]

Originally Posted by FTX I

we talked about that on the other thread. you may be right, and probably no difference, but as I said my clasp is perfectly centered and I just guessed the half link at 12 would be the answer, but I can be wrong tho.

I just played around and tried a couple different ways. Even tried 3 1/2 at the 6 and it didn't make much difference. I looked weird to me with the half link at the 6 closest to the clasp. I did go ahead and remove that fifth link at 12 and left the 1/2 link. I will just see how I like it. The way the glide lock is designed to come way out over a wet suit won't work like this though. I guess most of us don't use them for what they were truly meant for though

[subtona]

Sd

[Rags]

I've never tried on a sub-c but I can say that my 16610 is very comfy.

[aaron123]

I find the 16610 to be more comfortable. The Sub C is too chunky with the "super lugs" case.

[FTX I]

Thanks guys

[landroverking]

For me it's the Sub. But I haven't worn a Subc for days on end.
Only tried on so not a fair test.

[underdog33]

I find the 16610 extremely comfortable. I love my GMT-IIc BLNR (which should be similar to the Sub-C) but I find the 16610 more comfortable.

[Deepsea Florida]

Sub C more
Comfortable for me. I also have a 16800.
Sub C---glidelock ftw IMO

[papelandia]

14060m is the most comfortable

[Jason71]

Originally Posted by Broker Boy

The 16610 is lighter, but I get a better fit from the glidelock on my 116610 -- especially as my wrist size changes during the day.

I don't think I'd recommend adding an older sub. You won't wear it.

Really?? Won't wear it? I have both (several older subs and a WG SubC and DSSD). I rarely wear the ceramics. You just about can't pry a 5513 or 1680 off my wrist a great deal of the time. If it's not a plexi sub on my wrist it is a 16800, 16610, or 16610LV.

[FTX I]

I have seen bnib 16610 showing up from trusted guys here. And TBH I always look at those amazing Subs and Sds from andrew shear (sheartime). The C line is the best out there but having the date and buying the ND sometimes seem a little too much..Have not decided what to do. I promissed myself I would buy just one more, so I must do my homework. Too many wishes for a short money. Thanks everyone for the inputs.

[SLS]

Originally Posted by Jason71

Really?? Won't wear it? I have both (several older subs and a WG SubC and DSSD). I rarely wear the ceramics. You just about can't pry a 5513 or 1680 off my wrist a great deal of the time. If it's not a plexi sub on my wrist it is a 16800, 16610, or 16610LV.

I'm not a huge fan of the ceramics either...I just love the look and feel of a 5513 on my wrist.
Scott

[travisb]

Both super comfortable. I like the feel of the 116610 better.

[swils8610]

16610 for me...don't care the chunky lugs on the 116610. The glidelock is awesome though.


Rolex 16610
Rolex 216570 Polar
Rolex 116400GV

[dysondiver]

with a 6 1/2 inch wrist ,,, have you tried a mid size yachtmaster ,,, just a thought.

[MAJSmith]

FTX I, I have the same size wrist and struggled to find a comfortable fit for my GMT. After reading this article,http://www.minus4plus6.com/bracelet.htm, I decided to pull a permanent link off the 6 side and the fit was perfect. Now I have 3 (3.5 if you count the clasp link) links on the 6:00 side and 6 links on the 12:00 side. I used the vice grips method. Just clamp and pull.

[FTX I]

Originally Posted by MAJSmith

FTX I, I have the same size wrist and struggled to find a comfortable fit for my GMT. After reading this article,http://www.minus4plus6.com/bracelet.htm, I decided to pull a permanent link off the 6 side and the fit was perfect. Now I have 3 (3.5 if you count the clasp link) links on the 6:00 side and 6 links on the 12:00 side. I used the vice grips method. Just clamp and pull.

Thanks Major. Thats exactly what Im afraid of: The fit. My Sub-C is tailor made. Never had a watch with such a perfect fit. My Seamasters are great too but the lack of micro adjustments give the sub-C the medal here. Adding a No date C can be more redundant than I can stand, but the idea of taking my chances with other models with different clasps is an uncomfortable idea. Until now the ND-C is still top of mind. Lets see what months to come will bring.