The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 5 May 2014, 05:01 AM   #1
duran
"TRF" Member
 
duran's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 240
a sd4000 substitute.

20140504_115706.jpg
I really want the new sd4000 but cant justify adding it to my collection.
duran is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 05:23 AM   #2
subtona
"TRF" Member
 
subtona's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Real Name: gus
Location: East Coast
Watch: APK & sometimes Y
Posts: 26,554
t
r
a
d
e

i
n



great shot & equally classic watch… the two are only different, not better or worse.
__________________
subtona is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 05:27 AM   #3
tkerrmd
"TRF" Member
 
tkerrmd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Real Name: Tom
Location: In a race car!
Watch: ME RACE PORSCHES
Posts: 24,123
Understandable to most people but probably not on this forum were every tiny difference in a watch is like a new planet was discovered!
tkerrmd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 05:31 AM   #4
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Luckily, we have a ton of options. Sub, Sub Date, SD, DSSD. There is something for everybody.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 05:57 AM   #5
CJM89
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 13
That is the quintessential dive watch. The one that really started them all.
CJM89 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 06:01 AM   #6
artschool
"TRF" Member
 
artschool's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: uk
Posts: 1,215
I have a nd sub c and a new SDc.

Going to keep them both because I don't want to part with the submariner.
artschool is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 08:20 AM   #7
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Lets have a gold SDc for the subc owners. Come on Dufour!
AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 08:32 AM   #8
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
Quote:
Originally Posted by CJM89 View Post
That is the quintessential dive watch. The one that really started them all.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 08:35 AM   #9
Survivor
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Real Name: Rob
Location: Thousand Oaks
Watch: DSSD
Posts: 1,017
Quote:
Originally Posted by duran View Post
Attachment 490473
I really want the new sd4000 but cant justify adding it to my collection.
There's no such thing as a substitute for a classic or new SD 4000.....
Survivor is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 08:39 AM   #10
Speed
"TRF" Member
 
Speed's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
Understandable to most people but probably not on this forum were every tiny difference in a watch is like a new planet was discovered!

Oh boy...did you ever nail it!

Love this post :-)
Speed is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 09:53 AM   #11
Chewbacca
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2012
Real Name: CJ
Location: Kashyyyk
Watch: Kessel Run Chrono
Posts: 21,112
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
Understandable to most people but probably not on this forum were every tiny difference in a watch is like a new planet was discovered!
Chewbacca is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 10:02 AM   #12
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
...every tiny difference in a watch is like a new planet was discovered!
Amen, brother!

To the OP: that Sub of yours is a beauty. I wouldn't consider it a substitute for anything.
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 10:13 AM   #13
14060m
"TRF" Member
 
14060m's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: USA
Watch: 116610 , 16233
Posts: 1,802
Every collection should have a sub and SD4000
__________________
14060m is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 10:39 AM   #14
lmcgbaj
"TRF" Member
 
lmcgbaj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Real Name: G
Location: Canada
Watch: es are FUN!!!
Posts: 1,979
You have an excellent substitute. I like it better myself.
__________________
"Do not take life too seriously. You will never get out of it alive. "
lmcgbaj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 10:40 AM   #15
Kingair
"TRF" Member
 
Kingair's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Watch: Not enough ;-)
Posts: 21,232
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
Understandable to most people but probably not on this forum were every tiny difference in a watch is like a new planet was discovered!
Correct Tom

We need to move forward

HAGOne

Kingair is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 12:14 PM   #16
vman
2024 Pledge Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Capt Swerve
Location: North Carolina
Watch: less TV
Posts: 2,230
Unless you're into saturation diving, your Sub should serve you well.
vman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 12:34 PM   #17
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
Understandable to most people but probably not on this forum were every tiny difference in a watch is like a new planet was discovered!
Haha, right on Tom.
Remember the date magnification variance concerns between the GMT2 an Sub date, and only but here could I ever witness folks arguing over whether it's Submahriner or Submeeriner or Submareener, sigh.


I think the 114060 is "THEE" benchmark Rolex diver and every other one builds on its foundation. I'd feel very fortunate to own it if I could but I can't have them all so just like you op I just pick the ones that suit my needs accordingly.
The 114060 has one quality very few Rolex have, elegant simplicity and symmetrical beauty.
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 12:35 PM   #18
thomaspp
"TRF" Member
 
thomaspp's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: N/A
Posts: 11,137
Nice!
__________________
Instagram: @watches_anonymous
thomaspp is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 01:05 PM   #19
Gharddog03
"TRF" Member
 
Gharddog03's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Real Name: Genaro
Location: Fresno Ca.
Watch: R O L E X
Posts: 4,466
Quote:
Originally Posted by artschool View Post
I have a nd sub c and a new SDc.

Going to keep them both because I don't want to part with the submariner.
Any side by side pics? It appears the sdc is smaller?

The 114060 may be my next purchase
Gharddog03 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 01:06 PM   #20
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
Haha, right on Tom.
Remember the date magnification variance concerns between the GMT2 an Sub date, and only but here could I ever witness folks arguing over whether it's Submahriner or Submeeriner or Submareener, sigh.


I think the 114060 is "THEE" benchmark Rolex diver and every other one builds on its foundation. I'd feel very fortunate to own it if I could but I can't have them all so just like you op I just pick the ones that suit my needs accordingly.
The 114060 has one quality very few Rolex have, elegant simplicity and symmetrical beauty.
As always, spot on.
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 01:15 PM   #21
Rashid.bk
"TRF" Member
 
Rashid.bk's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Location: Dallas
Watch: 12800ft = 3900m
Posts: 11,173
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wesley Crusher View Post
As always, spot on.
You're a real gentleman Wes.

Sent from my Z1 Compact
Rashid.bk is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 01:43 PM   #22
DCgator
"TRF" Member
 
DCgator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: PNW
Watch: DS,BLNR,SubLV,DJ2
Posts: 8,123
Icon6

Quote:
Originally Posted by Survivor View Post
There's no such thing as a substitute for a classic or new SD 4000.....
I believe there is.... it's called SubC and Deepsea. My 2c.

To the OP - get the one that sings to you!!
DCgator is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 02:11 PM   #23
DCheeta
"TRF" Member
 
DCheeta's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
Quote:
Originally Posted by Gharddog03 View Post
Any side by side pics? It appears the sdc is smaller?

The 114060 may be my next purchase
Artschool posted some brilliant side-by-side pics when he got his SD. Check them out:

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=350171
DCheeta is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 02:27 PM   #24
mtb
"TRF" Member
 
mtb's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Singapore
Watch: Sky/Sea/Land
Posts: 681
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
The 114060 has one quality very few Rolex have, elegant simplicity and symmetrical beauty.
Yes

I started with DSSD, and have always disliked the blocky lugs...

However, I tried a 114060 yesterday, and wow, it was NICE

Yes it's smaller than DSSD and 216570, but somehow with the lack of cyclops, it didn't feel so blocky... and it was just so clean!
mtb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 06:00 PM   #25
Robbyman
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Blighty (England)
Watch: Daytona/Pepsi/Sub
Posts: 1,517
There can be only one
Robbyman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 06:01 PM   #26
Wesley Crusher
"TRF" Member
 
Wesley Crusher's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rashid.bk View Post
You're a real gentleman Wes.

Sent from my Z1 Compact
Wesley Crusher is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 07:11 PM   #27
travisb
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
travisb's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,425
The new SD is a great compliment to the 114060. Many differences. I wouldn't want to part with the Sub.
travisb is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 5 May 2014, 08:47 PM   #28
speedy_master1
"TRF" Member
 
speedy_master1's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: california
Watch: can't decide.
Posts: 2,477
Quote:
Originally Posted by duran View Post
Attachment 490473
I really want the new sd4000 but cant justify adding it to my collection.
i actually like the 114060 better.
speedy_master1 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.