ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
26 July 2014, 12:54 AM | #1 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
SM300 GMT Chronograph
Just got this note from my local boutique...
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
26 July 2014, 11:29 PM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
|
I want to like this watch but there is just so much going on
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy. -TRF Member 6982- |
27 July 2014, 12:39 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: weehawken
Posts: 847
|
|
27 July 2014, 12:56 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Xenophon
Location: UK
Posts: 2,727
|
I had a look at one in an Omega Boutique last week. What put me off was its gigantic diameter and height and, in my view, fussy dial decoration. I was disappointed as I like the idea of a GMT chronograph (I used to own a Bremont ALT1-Z). After seeing this model I won't be putting it on my list. I was far more impressed with the AT GMT chronograph.
__________________
The sea! The sea! Θάλαττα! θάλαττα! |
27 July 2014, 02:04 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Asad A. Awan
Location: kabul, Afghanista
Watch: Tissot PRX
Posts: 2,698
|
while I am neither a chrono guy and not a busy dial guy, although I do love GMTs, I just really like this watch...it is bold in a refreshing way, to me..I mean it is not in your face, it has a nicely styled case and color splashes so it doesnt look too 'rude' in its massive-ness..I dont know if I make sense, but just simply, I find it quiet appealing..I like the idea of a GMT diver with an actual diver's bezel, though I would never use one for diving, but just the design fact is appreciable.
|
27 July 2014, 02:48 AM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: N/A
Posts: 42
|
If I lived in the Boston area (moved out a year ago) I would try and find an Omega dealer in New Hampshire (no sales tax in the Live Free or Die state).
Any day one can avoid paying taxes to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts is a good day. Kris |
27 July 2014, 05:15 AM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Flavio
Location: N/A
Posts: 14,654
|
Horrifying
|
27 July 2014, 05:29 AM | #8 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2007
Location: USA
Watch: 126600, 116500LN
Posts: 12,849
|
I agree with all of the comments made here so far LOL!! How rare is that on a TRF thread?
__________________
"I'm kind of a big deal... on a fairly irrelevant social media site that falsely inflates my fragile ego" |
27 July 2014, 04:49 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,181
|
Wow, talk about a watch with an identity crisis...
|
27 July 2014, 10:43 PM | #10 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Real Name: Max
Location: Toronto
Watch: Exp 1, DJ Tuxedo
Posts: 2,469
|
Too Much Information. Yikes.
|
3 August 2014, 05:36 AM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 12
|
I got some wristtime with this one yesterday. No, the dial I find is not too busy but well thought out. The width is just right. The movement hits a sweetspot in my opinion.
However.... The thickness is throwing the whole watch off balance and makes it unwearable in my opinion. What could have been a classic was turned into sth even more unwieldy than the Z-33 due to its weight. It is a shame. Best, Bubbs99 |
9 August 2014, 05:56 AM | #12 |
Banned
Join Date: Sep 2011
Real Name: -------
Location: -------
Watch: ---------
Posts: 12,609
|
I looked at these during lunch today, massive, hate it, but I'm a 40mm guy and don't like a small brick siting on my wrist...
|
9 August 2014, 06:57 AM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Left Coast
Posts: 7,025
|
I suppose if you want to crowbar a GMT function into a diver this is one way to do it, but lose the chrono functions and the HEV. Personally, I'd also lose the dive bezel altogether in favor of a bi-directional GMT bezel with 24 clicks that gives me numerous time zones. Even if I was a recreational diver, which I'm not, I doubt I'd need the ET bezel or the HEV so I'd prefer a GMT function with more performance. I also prefer the speedy bracelet to that one, and 44mm is a bit big for me.
__________________
Some days it's just not worth chewing through the restraints. |
9 August 2014, 07:06 AM | #14 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
|
A huge watch that will be out of style in two years when watch sizes revert to the 36 - 40mm norm.
|
11 August 2014, 01:47 AM | #15 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Wes
Location: Holosuite
Posts: 6,345
|
That thing is so over the top. Omega should have just gone all the way and added a perpetual calendar and bluetooth. |
11 August 2014, 03:57 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Neverland
Posts: 67
|
Not my cup of tea... The Breitling Chronomat 44 GMT seems better executed for those who want so many functions.
__________________
|
11 August 2014, 09:30 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Canada
Watch: gmt master
Posts: 428
|
i like it so far....and i like big heavy gear
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.