ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
3 October 2014, 10:07 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 45
|
Red Sub Experts!
I am about to close on the transaction. PLEASE tell me if you see any glaring issues with this...thanks in advance!
http://www.network54.com/Forum/20767...+9315+Bracelet |
3 October 2014, 10:12 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 45
|
Serial number seems to line up with the mark iv dial with open 6's. Is the bezel insert original?
|
3 October 2014, 10:15 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: USA
Posts: 2,615
|
Watch is described accurately.
__________________
|
3 October 2014, 11:42 AM | #4 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
nice, but worn...
I'm certainly no expert, just a fan and owner. Looks like a Nice model with the original band, but it has some wear.
Just my opinion, if you are going to spend 12k, why not spend a little more and get a much better condition model... It took me some time to find this watch, and then convince the owner to sell it me, but I am very glad I did...
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
3 October 2014, 11:52 AM | #5 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 45
|
That is a great example Tudor66. I guess patience is the key.
As i look at non serviced, original pieces in the future, how much should i budget (range-wise) for a complete overhaul from someone like Bob ridley or abc in 2014 for a 1680? |
3 October 2014, 12:12 PM | #6 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Sam
Location: los Angeles
Posts: 2,051
|
Quote:
Abc does a great job. 500 plus depending on what u want to do with it. The only thing that bothers me with this watch is the band. Sure u can get it fixed by MY but it will be away for months. Not a deal breaker but still... Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
|
3 October 2014, 12:34 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Dallas TX
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,812
|
I was looking at the same piece earlier today, the imperfection at the bottom of the dial (fully disclosed by the seller) kill it for me though. In vintage... dial and hands are everything.
|
3 October 2014, 12:44 PM | #8 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2012
Real Name: Nathaniel
Location: Wisconsin
Watch: 5513
Posts: 1,991
|
|
3 October 2014, 07:57 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Switzerland
Posts: 14,298
|
I'm no expert, but it looks good to me - I could live with the slight oil residue on dial, which is otherwise excellent. Great case, awesome insert. Price OK/going rate. IMHO. Bracelet would fix up like new. I like it.
|
3 October 2014, 08:31 PM | #10 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
Yeah I also like the residue is only slight and probably wont be able to see it in most conditions unless you shine a bright light on it... I wanted to ask though about the the crown has it been changed?? Should that have 3 dots on it being triplock crown? Lovely insert aswell :-)
|
3 October 2014, 08:55 PM | #11 | |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2014
Real Name: John Baker III
Location: Spring,Texas
Watch: 1971 Red Sub
Posts: 2,222
|
Quote:
The crystal needs a nice buffing. The insert looks original to me. There is little or no corrosion on the hands. The prices of legitimate Red Subs is rising fast; if you can deal with the things that need a little "tweeking" I think you should consider this watch.
__________________
As I've grown older, I've learned that pleasing everyone is impossible, but pissing off everyone is a piece of cake. |
|
3 October 2014, 09:01 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2013
Real Name: Andy
Location: Dubai
Watch: 5131R,6263,5712T
Posts: 1,559
|
[QUOTE=JohnBaker3;5304148]The Twinlock crown is correct for 1970. I believe that the first 3 dot crowns showed up in late 1972.
Ahh ok then thats just me then, thanks for clarifying that thought I have seen some triplock on 69/70/71 models?? |
3 October 2014, 09:54 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: italy
Posts: 991
|
case has been produced at the beginning of 1971.
insert is obviously correct. about the crown : 700 ( twinlock ) is the default one for a 1680 in the 2.6 case range. first series triplock ( 702 ) arrives around the end of the year . but around 2.8 ( end of 1971 ) you can find both as pristine equipment. at 3.0 ( middle 1972 circa ) I expect to see 702 only. |
4 October 2014, 06:34 AM | #14 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Brooklyn, NY
Posts: 2,400
|
Watch is sold now, what a beauty. Little clean up would have worked wonders!
|
4 October 2014, 07:04 AM | #15 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: George
Location: Athens, Greece
Watch: es --> A lot !
Posts: 2,327
|
Quote:
__________________
Rolex owner since 1971. 5513 and 16700 the loved ones. DJ WG Jubilee 16170 for wife - U series Oyster Perpetual WG 177234 for daughter V-series |
|
4 October 2014, 07:44 AM | #16 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2013
Real Name: Kevin
Location: Maryland
Watch: My Open 6
Posts: 3,433
|
This watch would of cleaned up very nicely. Great patina and insert.
|
5 October 2014, 07:44 AM | #17 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 45
|
Thanks experts! The hunt goes on...
|
5 October 2014, 11:37 PM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Al
Location: California, USA
Watch: GMT- Pepsi
Posts: 3,462
|
band..
Note that I wear my RedSub on a 93150 bracelet that is thicker, more comfortable and certainly more common. The original 9315 bracelet is hidden away. I am sure the next owner will appreciate the pristine condition of the original band.
Good luck on your hunt...,
__________________
-NAWCC Member |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.