The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 14 October 2015, 04:47 PM   #1
briansshin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 41
Lume doesn't Glow anymore?

Hi All!

I've been reading more and more here and there about the Lume not working anymore on several people's watches who are trying to sell their watches. Can anybody explain why the Lume stops working? And also, once it stops working, is it irreversible? Is there no fix for it? Obviously you can replace the whole dial, but is there any other cheaper fixes for Lume not working?

Please advise!! I am currently looking to buy a watch, but the ad description says the Lume doesnt work. Obviously this concerns me, so I would like to know whats the solution to this problem.

Thank you all for your help in advancementals!! Have a great one yall.
__________________
2012 Blue/Gold Two-Tone Submariner Date with Ceramic Bezel and Glidelock Clasp -- V Serial [116613LB]

2020 Datejust 41 with 18k White Gold Fluted Bezel - Silver Dial with Stick indicators and Oyster Bracelet [126234]
briansshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2015, 04:52 PM   #2
mike
"TRF" Member
 
mike's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
I guess the question is what reference and timeframe is the watch. I assume it,
'S Rolex since you're in the
E Rolex forum. If it's a tritium dial it's reached it's limit on luminosity. Tritium has a half life of about 12.5years.
mike is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 14 October 2015, 08:41 PM   #3
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,668
Simply put, the issue is tritium vs Luminova/SuperLuminova markers. Tritium is a radio active compound which cause the markrers to glow and has about a 12 year half life. Luminva stores energy from light and cause the glowing and won't stop working with time other than needing to be recharged every day pretty much.. See the following for details on tritium.

http://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=31836
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 01:25 AM   #4
Tools
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
 
Tools's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,494
Quote:
Originally Posted by briansshin View Post
Hi All!

I've been reading more and more here and there about the Lume not working anymore on several people's watches who are trying to sell their watches. (1)Can anybody explain why the Lume stops working? (2)And also, once it stops working, is it irreversible? Is there no fix for it? (3)Obviously you can replace the whole dial, but is there any other cheaper fixes for Lume not working?

Please advise!! I am currently looking to buy a watch, but the ad description says the Lume doesnt work. (4)Obviously this concerns me, so I would like to know whats the solution to this problem.

Thank you all for your help in advancementals!! Have a great one yall.
(1) Explained above. old dials no longer glow. Rolex changed from tritium to Luminova in ~1998/99
(2) No, it is not reversible. They glowed because of the radioactive component exciting the paint, the radioactive is no longer active enough to do this.
(3) The fix is to replace the dial with a Luminova dial which is "rechargeable" by light.
(4) It shouldn't concern you. They all work the same way.
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....)
NAWCC Member
Tools is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 01:28 AM   #5
mjrchabot
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Toronto, ON
Watch: Rolex 116000, BB36
Posts: 147
Someone will know the exact year, but I believe it was around 2001-2002 that Rolex switched to Super Luminova.

My 1996 14060's dial didn't glow anymore - no cause of concern, though. Some people prefer the tritium dials because they age better and develop a beautiful, natural patina.
mjrchabot is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 01:46 AM   #6
briansshin
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: Baltimore, MD
Posts: 41
Wow thanks for the great input guys!! Now I understand the Lume issue that often sellers are speaking of. You guys have been more than helpful in explaining exactly what I was concerned about. You guys are the best and is what makes The Rolezlx Forums so special!!! 😢

Again.. Thank you for the replies. I now have gained more knowledge that will help me on all my future purchases ☺


Sent from my SCH-I545 using Tapatalk
__________________
2012 Blue/Gold Two-Tone Submariner Date with Ceramic Bezel and Glidelock Clasp -- V Serial [116613LB]

2020 Datejust 41 with 18k White Gold Fluted Bezel - Silver Dial with Stick indicators and Oyster Bracelet [126234]
briansshin is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 01:50 AM   #7
IT Nerd
2024 Pledge Member
 
IT Nerd's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: VA
Watch: me flip
Posts: 1,021
On the bright side, the watch is probably free of beta radiation by now.
IT Nerd is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 02:44 AM   #8
WIS
"TRF" Member
 
WIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seoul
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by IT Nerd View Post
On the bright side, the watch is probably free of beta radiation by now.

Lol yeah that's what I figure on my "t Swiss made t" datejust that doesn't "glow" anymore... The radiatiation can't hurt me now...


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 02:58 AM   #9
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
I wouldn't call it an "issue". I'm more worried when a 35-40 year old Rolex glows like a fire!
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 03:49 AM   #10
EdipisReks
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIS View Post
Lol yeah that's what I figure on my "t Swiss made t" datejust that doesn't "glow" anymore... The radiatiation can't hurt me now...
It wasn't going to hurt you anyway, unless you ate the luminous paint.
EdipisReks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 04:05 AM   #11
Kyle13
"TRF" Member
 
Kyle13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdipisReks View Post
It wasn't going to hurt you anyway, unless you ate the luminous paint.

Even if you ate the paint, nothing would really come of it! You would have to eat the paint of thousands of watches and even then you would probably get sick to your stomach! Lol


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kyle13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 04:15 AM   #12
WIS
"TRF" Member
 
WIS's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Seoul
Posts: 72
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdipisReks View Post
It wasn't going to hurt you anyway, unless you ate the luminous paint.

You never know


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
WIS is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 08:45 AM   #13
SpaceWanderer
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: N/A
Posts: 172
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tools View Post
(1) Explained above. old dials no longer glow. Rolex changed from tritium to Luminova in ~1998/99
(2) No, it is not reversible. They glowed because of the radioactive component exciting the paint, the radioactive is no longer active enough to do this.
(3) The fix is to replace the dial with a Luminova dial which is "rechargeable" by light.
(4) It shouldn't concern you. They all work the same way.
So when did Rolex go from Luminova to Chromalight? And does anybody really know the difference (other than hue)? Are they made by the same chemical concern?
SpaceWanderer is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 10:44 AM   #14
Flstfirider
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Flstfirider's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Auburn, AL
Watch: Rolex, Tudor
Posts: 1,139
Quote:
Originally Posted by mjrchabot View Post
Someone will know the exact year, but I believe it was around 2001-2002 that Rolex switched to Super Luminova.

My 1996 14060's dial didn't glow anymore - no cause of concern, though. Some people prefer the tritium dials because they age better and develop a beautiful, natural patina.
I believe that around '98 they went to Luminova, then a few years later to Super Luminova....now Chomalight.
Flstfirider is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 11:15 AM   #15
EdipisReks
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by WIS View Post
You never know
Yes you do. Tritium is a low energy beta emitter. Low energy beta particles can't penetrate your skin, let alone the case and crystal of the watch.
EdipisReks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 11:17 AM   #16
EdipisReks
Banned
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Cincinnati
Posts: 178
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kyle13 View Post
Even if you ate the paint, nothing would really come of it! You would have to eat the paint of thousands of watches and even then you would probably get sick to your stomach! Lol
Sure, but internal beta emission, even very low energy such as from tritium, and even with materials, again like tritium, that have short biological half-lives and don't bioaccumulate, is still likely to cause harm, even if minor and of no concern.
EdipisReks is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 11:53 AM   #17
Kyle13
"TRF" Member
 
Kyle13's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 484
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdipisReks View Post
Sure, but internal beta emission, even very low energy such as from tritium, and even with materials, again like tritium, that have short biological half-lives and don't bioaccumulate, is still likely to cause harm, even if minor and of no concern.

Correct but, if I'm not mistaken, tritium decays into helium-3 which is non radioactive so you wouldn't have to worry about beta particles! 👍🏻 If you were to eat tritium before the half life and decay, then beta particles would be a worry!


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Kyle13 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 01:04 PM   #18
southtexas
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
southtexas's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Great State of TX
Posts: 5,761
Trit ages nicely. I wonder how lumi will look in 50 years?




Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
Forty six & 2 are just ahead of me.

Follow me on Instagram @ccrolex
southtexas is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 15 October 2015, 06:23 PM   #19
avirom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: israel
Posts: 123
i had the hour markers and hands on my 1500 date (1982) relumed without replacing the dail or hands.

watch maker told me that he filed down and and scraped of all the remains of the old trituim and then relumed everything.

works fine now - cost me about $80 including new seals and pressure test.
avirom is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.