ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

DARK_KNIGHT · 4 January 2016, 05:22 AM

Summary: it's a replica.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jfestrelabr · 4 January 2016, 08:56 AM

Batman is 10000% fake

Abraço Cambada!!!!!!

Chary · 4 January 2016, 04:42 PM

Sorry for your co-worker but that watch is totally fake....

Daryl · 4 January 2016, 05:18 PM

Sorry

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Dishpro01 · 26 January 2016, 02:16 PM

The hand stack looks correct, the crystal does not looked scratched, the cyclops and date mag and font are not seen well enough to say. The sel fit aren't seen well enough with just one pick. The cg's and bezel ring look alright.Take the case back off and let's see the movement. But when in doubt take it to an A.D. or a watchmaker that works on Rolex. This watch is not bad enough to tell from 1 very bad picture at a terrible angle.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

rolex_DateJust · 26 January 2016, 10:38 PM

Really bad fake if you ask me

occb2 · 27 January 2016, 12:16 AM

Dishpro I don't think your looking at the right GMT. Here is my GMT. its not a bat man but regular. 1. Color in bezel are platinum not white. I moved my date disk so you can see the 4. The GMT hand is half as skinny as the GMT hand and big give away is look at the loom on the dial. How fat the actual lume is placed. Rolex doesn't do that.

LazyDaniel · 27 January 2016, 02:21 AM

it's 100% fake. The way the colors blend together (black and blue) is a big give away..

GradyPhilpott · 27 January 2016, 08:02 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dishpro01

The hand stack looks correct, the crystal does not looked scratched, the cyclops and date mag and font are not seen well enough to say. The sel fit aren't seen well enough with just one pick. The cg's and bezel ring look alright.Take the case back off and let's see the movement. But when in doubt take it to an A.D. or a watchmaker that works on Rolex. This watch is not bad enough to tell from 1 very bad picture at a terrible angle.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

There are so many tells, it's not funny.

Just the overall impression is bad without looking at details.

beshannon · 27 January 2016, 10:13 AM

Nasty!

Mosbrook · 27 January 2016, 01:49 PM

The bracelet looks like folded aluminum foil gum wrappers.

rolex_DateJust · 27 January 2016, 03:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Dishpro01

The hand stack looks correct, the crystal does not looked scratched, the cyclops and date mag and font are not seen well enough to say. The sel fit aren't seen well enough with just one pick. The cg's and bezel ring look alright.Take the case back off and let's see the movement. But when in doubt take it to an A.D. or a watchmaker that works on Rolex. This watch is not bad enough to tell from 1 very bad picture at a terrible angle.

Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

So my guesses are you think this watch is genuine?

TheBluePrince · 27 January 2016, 10:10 PM

Lightforce1911 · 29 January 2016, 01:18 PM

The exact reason is to only buy from.trusted ppl lol

Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

CRM114 · 30 January 2016, 03:31 AM

100% fake, so many things wrong. Already mentioned; hand stack, join location of black and blue on bezel, date wheel font etc.

Another glaring one, the first thing I noticed; it's not even telling the correct time. It's 36 minutes past the hour and the 24 hr hand isn't even close where it should be relative to the dial. Even on a correct hand-stacked GMT viewed from that slightly-off angle where there would be a greater parallax illusion compared to this fake it wouldn't look that incorrect.

michaelpalmer · 30 January 2016, 03:42 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Mickyfin

Both watches in photo are fake. Look at the lume on the Mil.

What's wrong with the lume on the Mil? It looks good to me.

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

WAK4 · 2 February 2016, 02:27 AM

OP disappeared - wonder how things went at the AD...?

4 January 2016, 05:22 AM	#31
DARK_KNIGHT "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2008 Real Name: Jack Location: Dothan Watch: Cartier Posts: 1,236	Summary: it's a replica. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ "The difference between stupidity and genius is that genius has its limits."

4 January 2016, 05:18 PM	#34
Daryl 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Apr 2015 Location: USA Posts: 3,423	Sorry Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk __________________ 2FA-Enabled Official Member "Perpetual 30" Las Vegas International GTG 2016 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2017 Official Member "WIS-CON" Las Vegas International GTG 2019

26 January 2016, 10:38 PM	#36
rolex_DateJust 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2011 Real Name: Sergio Location: Miami, FL Watch: Yes please! Posts: 1,781	Really bad fake if you ask me __________________ ♛ 126610LV ♛ 16220 Salmon ♛ 126713GRNR ♛ 18238 Ω Speedmaster Moonwatch

27 January 2016, 10:13 AM	#40
beshannon "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2009 Real Name: Brian Location: Northern Virginia Watch: One of Not Many Posts: 17,892	Nasty! __________________ IWC Portugieser 7 Day, Omega Seamaster SMP300m, Vacheron Constantin Traditionnelle Complete Calendar, Glashutte PanoInverse, Glashutte SeaQ Panorama Date, Omega Aqua Terra 150, Omega CK 859, Omega Speedmaster 3861 Moonwatch, Breitling Superocean Steelfish, JLC Atmos Transparent Clock

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

4 January 2016, 08:56 AM	#32
jfestrelabr "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2009 Real Name: Felipe Location: Brazil Watch: ALL rolex models Posts: 397	Batman is 10000% fake Abraço Cambada!!!!!!

4 January 2016, 04:42 PM	#33
Chary Banned Join Date: Mar 2009 Location: USA Watch: 15407ST Posts: 963	Sorry for your co-worker but that watch is totally fake....

26 January 2016, 02:16 PM	#35
Dishpro01 "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2013 Real Name: Michael Location: Northern NM Watch: Rolex 16610 Posts: 181	The hand stack looks correct, the crystal does not looked scratched, the cyclops and date mag and font are not seen well enough to say. The sel fit aren't seen well enough with just one pick. The cg's and bezel ring look alright.Take the case back off and let's see the movement. But when in doubt take it to an A.D. or a watchmaker that works on Rolex. This watch is not bad enough to tell from 1 very bad picture at a terrible angle. Sent from my SM-N920V using Tapatalk

27 January 2016, 02:21 AM	#38
LazyDaniel "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2014 Real Name: Daniel Location: New York City Watch: 116500LN Posts: 166	it's 100% fake. The way the colors blend together (black and blue) is a big give away..

27 January 2016, 01:49 PM	#41
Mosbrook "TRF" Member Join Date: Oct 2014 Location: Cleveland Posts: 414	The bracelet looks like folded aluminum foil gum wrappers.

27 January 2016, 10:10 PM	#43
TheBluePrince "TRF" Member Join Date: Dec 2009 Location: London Posts: 2,081

29 January 2016, 01:18 PM	#44
Lightforce1911 "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2016 Location: evanston Posts: 260	The exact reason is to only buy from.trusted ppl lol Sent from my SM-N920T using Tapatalk

30 January 2016, 03:31 AM	#45
CRM114 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2015 Location: HK & USA Watch: GMTs,1803, 16610LV Posts: 2,001	100% fake, so many things wrong. Already mentioned; hand stack, join location of black and blue on bezel, date wheel font etc. Another glaring one, the first thing I noticed; it's not even telling the correct time. It's 36 minutes past the hour and the 24 hr hand isn't even close where it should be relative to the dial. Even on a correct hand-stacked GMT viewed from that slightly-off angle where there would be a greater parallax illusion compared to this fake it wouldn't look that incorrect.

2 February 2016, 02:27 AM	#47
WAK4 2024 Pledge Member Join Date: Oct 2008 Real Name: Bill Location: NJ Watch: Always changing Posts: 4,172	OP disappeared - wonder how things went at the AD...?

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)