ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
2 February 2016, 01:50 AM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Real Name: Mike G
Location: Ohio
Watch: Rolex-Patek-AP
Posts: 3,075
|
31mm is the way to go. When you are in your 50s you will want to be able to read the darn thing and it is not a huge watch
|
2 February 2016, 03:13 AM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2011
Location: SF & HK
Watch: Submariner 116610v
Posts: 258
|
26mm is, in my opinion, much more elegant.
|
2 February 2016, 03:15 AM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Canada
Posts: 839
|
As I stated before, it's Elegance vs Sportiness
|
2 February 2016, 04:33 AM | #34 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: Toronto
Watch: Rolex, Tudor, Tag
Posts: 83
|
I think 26 looks nicer on you. It gives a more classy look
Sent from my SM-N900W8 using Tapatalk |
2 February 2016, 07:04 AM | #35 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: South Carolina
Posts: 513
|
Food for thought. I think i have read where Rolex will be discontinuing the 26mm.
|
2 February 2016, 08:00 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Canada
Posts: 157
|
I picked up the 31mm with Rhodium dial for my wife. Looks great on her and she absolutely loves it.
|
2 February 2016, 08:59 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2012
Real Name: John
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 982
|
More importantly, the White bowling shoes with the Silver tips look fantastic.
|
2 February 2016, 09:06 AM | #38 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Joe
Location: Los Angeles
Watch: Daytona + GMT BLNR
Posts: 4,839
|
My wife likes her 26mm. She did not like the 31. She is smallish. Whatever feels best to you.
|
2 February 2016, 09:17 AM | #39 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Over Yonder
Watch: d-d40wg
Posts: 746
|
Quote:
__________________
Orbis non sufficit |
|
2 February 2016, 09:43 AM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2011
Real Name: Brandon
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: my money vanish
Posts: 8,506
|
Both fit you well. I prefer the 26mm.
My wife is 5'10" and of average build but has small hands (size 4 1/2 fingers). She wears a 26mm and has pushed back on taking my old 36mm DJ. We have yet to try a 31mm. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
2 February 2016, 03:16 PM | #41 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Finland
Posts: 277
|
Both look good, but like other has said. 26mm looks more classy and elegant, 31 mm looks more sporty. But I would say 26mm might work better as a all around watch.
|
3 February 2016, 08:53 AM | #42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: UK
Posts: 82
|
They both look very nice on you, however, I would consider longevity of the style.
I would personally pick the 26mm as it is more understated and elegant. It will work with a wider variety of outfits and occasions and you will still be able to wear it in 30-40 years time with grace and elegance. Having said that, that's just my opinion, you can't really go wrong with either. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
3 February 2016, 04:19 PM | #43 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2014
Real Name: John
Location: West Side
Watch: Your Back
Posts: 21
|
My wife was in the same situation, she choose the 31mm as she wrote a 26mm for 15 years.
|
6 February 2016, 03:15 AM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: philippines
Posts: 5
|
Thank you so much guys for the replies! Its really hard to choose since both are really nice! I chose the 31mm for now, so i can have an everyday watch. Will reserve the 26mm for a two-tone watch in the next few years. Hopefully :)
Here's a pic of the watch i chose alongside my husband's. I love it so much!!!! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.