The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 19 April 2016, 02:06 PM   #61
Chadridv
2024 Pledge Member
 
Chadridv's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Real Name: Chadri
Location: LI, NY
Watch: 116610LV
Posts: 11,357
If I could afford it I'd have one SS beater, and all my other watches would be WG or RG. White gold for Rolex and RG for Audemars! Maybe id pick up some Rolex platinum too. Why not right!? Lol.
Chadridv is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 02:50 PM   #62
Muzz
"TRF" Member
 
Muzz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Real Name: Steve
Location: TO CAD, HCMC VN
Watch: MP 18946
Posts: 7,292
I like the heft. Secretly I prefer WG and I sadly feel platinum is a little too heavy. Certain YG pieces can attract unfavorable eyes.
Muzz is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 03:28 PM   #63
ppalasthira
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: ASK
Watch: SubC.5711.D500
Posts: 2,236
Quote:
Originally Posted by watchlover135 View Post
Aside from gold watches being more expensive, what are some reasons that you prefer stainless steel watches as opposed to yellow or rose gold watches ?


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I think people have a perception that gold is softer than SS. And that makes it more durable. But I wear my gold watches just as hard as my SS watches and they seem to be ok. Gold is softer. But they are just as tough imo.
ppalasthira is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 04:12 PM   #64
Nav01L
"TRF" Member
 
Nav01L's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Real Name: Fred
Location: Zurich
Posts: 2,697
Quote:
Originally Posted by Tebow15 View Post
are you really Archie Luxury???


Well we know he's not the Donald... ;)
__________________
Greetings from Switzerland

Remember, the dignity you surrender at your AD‘s doorstep will never be recovered by wearing the watch he may get you.
Nav01L is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 08:58 PM   #65
peterskinner
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: East Sussex U
Posts: 1,351
White gold is, to the bystander, seen as stainless steel. There's nothing 'flash' about it. For me, the extra weight and the feeling of having something 'special' on my wrist is rather pleasing. It's not a sin...but it is expensive. So I have SS and white gold watches. Both are just fine.
Come to think of it, I'd like a platinum watch, but it's beyond my sensible reach.
peterskinner is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 09:15 PM   #66
jrs146
"TRF" Member
 
jrs146's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Real Name: Josh
Location: Lost in time
Watch: Me Nae Nae
Posts: 9,823
Not sure if this is a preference per say. But when I think of Rolex, I think of sporty, durable, do-all watches. That seems better fit in SS.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
__________________
"Sometimes the songs that we hear are just songs of our own."
-Jerome J. Garcia, Robert C. Hunter
jrs146 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 09:41 PM   #67
Mick P
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: UK / Spain
Watch: 39mm Explorer
Posts: 1,990
Chaps

I have three SS Rolex and I bought them because they look good, are reasonably discreet, good quality, will last a lifetime and perfectly fit the ethos of Rolex making a sporty yet cool looking watch.

The problem with gold, which I will never buy, is that it attracts the wrong sort of attention. Whilst someone may love wearing a gold Rolex, it does have visual impact and people will stare at it for a variety of reasons, most of which are bad. For this reason, I will stick with SS.

Regards

Mick
Mick P is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 10:51 PM   #68
henry333
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Real Name: Hendricks
Location: USA
Watch: 116600
Posts: 826
Because it's GOLD
henry333 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 10:59 PM   #69
madmax21
"TRF" Member
 
madmax21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Toronto Canada
Watch: GMT Master ll
Posts: 1,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by Patton250 View Post
For those of you thinking that stainless steel flies under the radar let me ask you this. Do you really think the type of person that will judge you in a negative way for your Rolex will seriously know the difference between your $8000 stainless steel Rolex and a $30,000 all gold Rolex and say something like this to themselves "well he's not too pretentious because he is only wearing a SS Rolex!". Because it's only that type of person who will notice you are wearing a Rolex and judge you for it to begin with. I really don't know anybody like that. If somebody I know is like that I am completely unaware of it. Everybody else could care less what we have on our wrists. Now that I wrist watch every time I'm at the mall or at restaurants I notice that a lot of people where gold Michael Kors watches. I mean talk about flying above the radar. LOL Those things are terribly obnoxious. Anyway wear what you like. The only reason why I don't have an all gold submariner is because I would have to sell my entire (well almost) collection to acquire one. I would love to have a yellow gold submariner and 36mm DD one day. Having said that everybody needs to have SS too.
I completely agree... I think that white gold watches however a bit of a waste of time, that of course is a personal opinion.

But I would never hesitate to buy a yellow gold watch in fact I'm looking at buying a two tone datejust II with Jubilee bracelet that hopefully will available soon
madmax21 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 19 April 2016, 11:09 PM   #70
joe100
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
joe100's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2007
Real Name: Joe
Location: New Mexico
Watch: Explorer
Posts: 12,838
I've done TT, which isn't bad. Gold is just too much... gold
__________________
It's Espresso, not Expresso. Coffee is not a train in Italy.
-TRF Member 6982-
joe100 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:11 AM   #71
txstats
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: CA
Posts: 64
SS can take a beating


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
txstats is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:16 AM   #72
speedolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by henry333 View Post
Because it's GOLD
Sometimes the answer is so simple, isn't it?
speedolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:22 AM   #73
brettpaul
"TRF" Member
 
brettpaul's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Real Name: Brett
Location: Bahrain, Dubai
Watch: Rolex and AP
Posts: 5,538
I prefer SS for all my watches, except complications where I would happily go to WG or Plat from PP. I'm just more comfortable with SS on my wrist and don't worry about scratches, dings, or dents!
__________________
Photostream on Instagram brett_in_bahrain
brettpaul is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:24 AM   #74
Wooddog44
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Real Name: Mark
Location: Long Island
Watch: SS Sub Date, TT DJ
Posts: 703
Quote:
Originally Posted by towernick View Post
I simply like the look of stainless watches, and I've never been a big fan of gold or flash. Some people love the flash of gold or two tone; I don't. Some rose gold pieces look ok, but I'd rather wear stainless.
Having both, SS Sub Date and TT DJ, I follow a "collar shirt" rule in that if the appropriate attire for where I'm going is a collar shirt (regardless of sleeve length) either is fine, shirt and tie: gold/tt for sure, no collar (or no shirt): SS.

Not sure if that is a real "rule", like brown belt/brown shoes, or just what I'm comfortable with but IMO it looks "off" to wear a watch with gold in it and a t-shirt or at the beach...
Wooddog44 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:25 AM   #75
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
Stainless much less prone to scratching and won't ding nearly as badly as gold. A good hit, and a gold case can be ruined. That's about it.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:45 AM   #76
Le Chef
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,005
This

Quote:
Originally Posted by beshannon View Post
I prefer to place emphasis on movements not precious metals
I prefer to upgrade the movement over a more expensive metal. I also don't like either YG or RG - just too flashy for my tastes.
Le Chef is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:49 AM   #77
tomchicago
Banned
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Chicago
Watch: 16710BLRO, 214270.
Posts: 2,717
The only g watch i have is my DD, but only because it isn't made in SS. If it were made in SS, I would have that over the g in two shakes!!! I regularly contemplate dumping it for a nice fluted SS DJ on a Jub.
tomchicago is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 01:07 AM   #78
locutus49
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: John
Location: La Jolla, CA
Watch: Platona
Posts: 12,194
All my assessories (shoe bit - Gucci), belt (silver buckle) etc. are silver toned so I wear SS, WG, and PT.
locutus49 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 01:18 AM   #79
Fiery
"TRF" Member
 
Fiery's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Europe
Watch: Sub-C 116610LN
Posts: 2,649
Quote:
Originally Posted by GB-man View Post
That said, I prefer SS watches for the following reasons beyond price:

1) it's lighter and hence more comfortable

2) it's more rugged

3) more subtle

4) I prefer sports watches so it's also more classical
+1
__________________
"In an age of obsolescence and gimmickry, this simple classic virtue of a Rolex is indeed a rarity." (Rolex ad from 1974)
Fiery is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 01:54 AM   #80
watchyou
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Location: Canada
Posts: 909
Quote:
Originally Posted by tkerrmd View Post
It looks great you should wear it you will still be cool
Cool watch
watchyou is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 01:59 AM   #81
HogwldFLTR
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
 
HogwldFLTR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,668
Go browse the Invicta Watch site; plenty of gold color and two tones there. Not recommending the brand but just looking at what's popular today. Also Michael Kors has got a lot of gold tone ones. Gold seems plenty popular outside of the forum.
__________________
Troglodyte in residence!

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?t=808599
HogwldFLTR is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 02:00 AM   #82
AK797
2024 Pledge Member
 
AK797's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wooddog44 View Post
Having both, SS Sub Date and TT DJ, I follow a "collar shirt" rule in that if the appropriate attire for where I'm going is a collar shirt (regardless of sleeve length) either is fine, shirt and tie: gold/tt for sure, no collar (or no shirt): SS.

Not sure if that is a real "rule", like brown belt/brown shoes, or just what I'm comfortable with but IMO it looks "off" to wear a watch with gold in it and a t-shirt or at the beach...
This watch, made of gold and azure, was made for the beach.

AK797 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 02:03 AM   #83
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedolex View Post
LOL, no, listen I actually like gold watches. Over the course of the last decade I tried to single-handedly bring gold back into vogue. I tried Rolexes, I even bought a Pulsar Big Time and an Executive, nothing worked.

And to show you I'm on the level, I just snapped this photo. I believe I am the only with WIS alive who bought both a white and yellow gold wedding band in 1996 so I could have a perfect match if and when gold ever came back into style (my wife still mocks me).
LOL, you are not the only one. I also have WG and YG wedding bands. When I had a Pam 176 I bought a Titanium band to match...OCD is a real burden. It was hard to find titanium belt buckles...
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 02:12 AM   #84
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
I dig YG, always have. I love the warmth of it, but as others have stated I do believe skin tone affects the way it looks on people. I have fairly dark skin and tan easy so I have always liked the way it looked on me. Over the years had a few solid YG models and many a TT. I personally like the warmth and the added weight.

For some reason as I have aged I have moved away from YG. I have sold/flipped all my YG/TT watches over the last couple of years. Has nothing to do with what is in style or what others think. I think mainly it was my shift to vintage models. However, a vintage DD in YG is on the list for future acquisitions. I need a dress watch and while some may not consider a DD a dress watch it will work for me. I plan to wear it on straps.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 02:25 AM   #85
speedolex
Banned
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: NYC
Posts: 1,231
Quote:
Originally Posted by droptopman View Post
LOL, you are not the only one. I also have WG and YG wedding bands. When I had a Pam 176 I bought a Titanium band to match...OCD is a real burden. It was hard to find titanium belt buckles...


LOL, you're my favorite poster on RF so this makes complete sense now.

FYI, 1016 on the left, Oyster bracelet, polished just Monday night using your synthetic steel wool technique after my successful Submariner showing at Turks & Caicos last week. Had a nice Rolex glisten in the sun whilst vacationing.
speedolex is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 02:35 AM   #86
droptopman
"TRF" Member
 
droptopman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Real Name: Mark
Location: Washington State
Watch: SUBS and GMT's!
Posts: 9,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by speedolex View Post
LOL, you're my favorite poster on RF so this makes complete sense now.

FYI, 1016 on the left, Oyster bracelet, polished just Monday night using your synthetic steel wool technique after my successful Submariner showing at Turks & Caicos last week. Had a nice Rolex glisten in the sun whilst vacationing.
LOL...I am cracking up. Good stuff. Excellent work on those bracelets.

I miss my 1016 sooo much. Great pic. Be well brother.
droptopman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 20 April 2016, 12:52 PM   #87
improviz
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Tejas
Watch: your step
Posts: 2,806
OP, this is by my count the third such thread (comparing gold to ss) you've started since joining TRF a few months ago. What's your point?
http://www.rolexforums.com/search.ph...&starteronly=1
__________________
116520 white; 16613 black; 116710; 16570 polar; 16600. AP 15400; 15703. Blancpain Fifty Fathoms. Glashutte Sport Evo GMT. Omega Planet Ocean 2907.50.91; Planet Ocean Liquidmetal LE 222.30.42.20.01.001; Seamaster 2255.80.00. Breitling Crosswind, white. Panerai PAM 005. VC Overseas Chrono, black.
improviz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

My Watch LLC


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.