ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
15 July 2008, 12:55 PM | #1 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
Watch running a bit slow
I started timing my watch to www.time.gov.
I started almost one week ago, actually 6 days and 12 hours ago. For the first few days, perfect time, to the second. Then over the last few days, it lost a little time. Now it's about 3 seconds slow. I'm wondering if my behavior wearing it factored in. Some nights I sleep with it, some nights do not. Some days I am more active, some days not, etc. Is this normal? What's the typical time difference over a week or month? I have the Sub Date |
15 July 2008, 01:04 PM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Art
Location: San Francisco
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 2,266
|
If it is running slow and you take it off at night, place it face up. Do not place it so it is in a vertical position; that would cause it to lose time compared to the face up position.
Most Rolexes should be accurate to about 2-3 seconds per day. The accuracy does depend on your usage of the watch.
__________________
Rolex SS Oyster Perpetual no date, TT Datejust Member #13992 HM Power to the Superlative Panda, officially certified! HMPanda eats, shoots and leaves. Rolexers do it with perpetual movements. |
15 July 2008, 01:09 PM | #3 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,554
|
IMO, I doubt that you would improve the accuracy that you have, more likely you will chase the positions and not get very far.
__________________
E |
15 July 2008, 01:17 PM | #4 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: So Cal, USA
Watch: Not a ONEWatch Man
Posts: 7,383
|
That is still extremely respectable variation from the referenced time.
The more active I am, the more variation I see.
__________________
SS Submariner Date "Z" SS SeaDweller "D" SS Submariner "Random" TT Blue Submariner "P" SS GMT-Master ll "M", Pepsi Pam 311, 524, 297 |
15 July 2008, 02:19 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: sf
Posts: 235
|
Thanks for the info. I guess I should be happy.
|
15 July 2008, 05:49 PM | #6 |
Member
Join Date: Jun 2008
Real Name: Jim
Location: San Diego
Posts: 198
|
If I'm reading this right it's lost 3 seconds in a week? And you're complaining? I'd be happy, I've never had an automatic quite that accurate. My most accurate watch is a Speedmaster which gains about .75 seconds a day on average.
My LV loses about 4 seconds a day, it's power reserve is not what it should be either, it's going in soon. |
15 July 2008, 06:21 PM | #7 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2007
Real Name: F
Location: Scotland
Watch: Exp II White Face
Posts: 4,272
|
No issues with this, this is amazing accuracy.
__________________
Why have what's new when you have what's best. f |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.