The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 1 July 2016, 01:41 AM   #31
ratty
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Real Name: Graham
Location: UK
Watch: Daytonas and Subs
Posts: 2,800
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rock View Post
Being retired I have plenty of time on my hands so I do a daily 'Time check/record' on the Sub and DJ. I now have several years data.
The data is very consistent year to year.

I can state that the Subs accuracy is best in Winter (May - October) when accuracy is +1 - 1.5 secs/day and worst in Summer (November - April) when accuracy is +2 - 2.5 secs/day.

The DJ is the opposite being worst in Winter being +2 - 3.5 secs/day and best in Summer at +1 - 2 secs/day.

How about that. Anyone else done an empirical study?
Thanks for this, very interesting.

I would be surprised if the temperature difference makes much difference to accuracy bearing in mind the watch will be either being worn on will be inside a house!

At the risk of sounding really sad, have you kept any info on average temperatures during the different seasons? Do you regularly get extremes of weather?

Thanks again
ratty is online now   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 11:48 AM   #32
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by Abdullah71601 View Post
Accuracy is irrelevant to your argument. Your argument requires a watch that is synchronized to the train conductors watch. You can have the most accurate watch in the world, but if it doesn't match the train system you will still be left standing on the platform.

You first need to define the time reference before you can measure whether your timepiece is accurate in context of your argument. The variation between your reference and your watch will define how accurate your watch is. Any other measurement is useless for your needs.
The train conductors in Australia all have Seiko Astron watches.

So I sync my Rolex watches to the trains.

Or my one.....
Attached Images
File Type: jpg DSC05914r.JPG (242.9 KB, 73 views)
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 12:39 PM   #33
kromdom
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: USA
Posts: 530
If I wake up the next day...WIN. if I remember where I last left my watch....WIN. Accuracy? meh
kromdom is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 07:28 PM   #34
Ian Macdermott
"TRF" Member
 
Ian Macdermott's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2015
Real Name: Willy.B.Banned
Location: Sheol
Watch: ing the detectives
Posts: 2,721
Both my Rolexes are accurate however if I need split second accuracy then i wear one if these two.






Sent by the power of thought
__________________
Welax no one other than wobblers muggers and sad WIS types notices your Wolex. The rest of the populace are way too busy staring at their shiny new iPhone 24s or worrying about paying the gas bill..
Ian Macdermott is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 07:56 PM   #35
Abdullah71601
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Calumet Harbor
Watch: ing da Bears
Posts: 13,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
The train conductors in Australia all have Seiko Astron watches.

So I sync my Rolex watches to the trains.

Or my one.....
This is the correct answer to the train example. How does it account for transmission delays?

I usually arrive early for trains, planes, and buses. They aren't supposed to depart before their scheduled time, but they occasionally deviate from their schedule. Rolex precision is well within the limits I need to be on time.

I really don't need to time events with great accuracy down to the second, but if I did, my time piece would be sync'd to NIST.
Abdullah71601 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 08:03 PM   #36
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,509
Bought a BNIB 116610LN on June 1st. I set it June 2nd. Just checked it and for 29 days it's -6 seconds. That's pretty much wearing it 10-12 hours a day
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 08:14 PM   #37
Rock
2024 Pledge Member
 
Rock's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Real Name: Rocky
Location: Australia
Watch: Grail:Bluesy
Posts: 17,846
Interesting comments Guys.
The "standard" I use is www.timeanddate.com/time/zones/aest
The thread is not really about "accuracy" so much as "temp variation and its effect on accuracy".
Graham, the data I have collected says clearly that a temp variation does have an effect on accuracy. Where I live, the summer and winter temperatures are very different and pretty consistent year to year. Equally, the 'inside' temperature varies by as much as 10 degrees Summer to Winter. With only a few days exception, we don't use heating in Winter or AirCon in Summer.
I didn't start keeping the data with any hypothesis in mind. Just looked at it and noticed the clear consistent variation from Summer to Winter each year.
Thought it might be a talking point.
__________________
Cellini 4112. Sub 14060M. DJ 16233. Rotherhams 1847 Pocket-watch.

Foundation Member of 'Horologists Anonymous' "Hi, I'm Rocky, and I'm a Horologist..."
Rock is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 08:15 PM   #38
dysondiver
"TRF" Member
 
dysondiver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Real Name: tom
Location: northern ireland
Watch: my fins
Posts: 10,063
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
Last time I checked was July 1983 just checked my watch now and its gained 1.9999987 of a second since then.But on a serious note all this checking stuff I gave up decades ago, I now check my watches around once a month or so. Then they are seldom more than a minute or two out that's accurate enough for me.Now the escapement of a mechanical watch in 24 hours pushes the gears 432,000 times and a day has 86,400 seconds.So for any mechanical watch to run within a few seconds a day is a mechanical marvel, given the fact that the movement is constantly affected by the earth's gravity, metal expansion and contraction, temperature variations, subtle changes in lubrication and friction, shocks, and so on.The fact is that no mechanical watch made will keep perfect time, very close yes but perfect no. But please guys to not to anal about a few seconds either way trust me far more important things in daily life.
all of that ,,, and listen to Baz Lurman , and wear sun screen.
dysondiver is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 09:10 PM   #39
Racerdj
2024 Pledge Member
 
Racerdj's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Indianapolis
Watch: Patek-Philippe
Posts: 16,832
While I do not have the amount of data you have achieved, sometimes the season of the year affects the accuracy slightly.
__________________
Rolex and Patek Philippe
Racerdj is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 09:27 PM   #40
Andad
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
 
Andad's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by mailman View Post
Bought a BNIB 116610LN on June 1st. I set it June 2nd. Just checked it and for 29 days it's -6 seconds. That's pretty much wearing it 10-12 hours a day
Excellent accuracy Mr P but wouldn't you rather have it +......

'Cos the train has left the station....
__________________
E

Andad is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 10:54 PM   #41
jshepard
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: USA
Watch: GMTII
Posts: 1,180
My study was a bit simpler. When I am called out for being late for something, I check my watch and go, "yep, I'm late! My bad..." If I am not called out for being late, I check my watch and go "alright, I am NOT late!" So far, none of my watches have failed me in these experiments expect for an instance when I forgot to wind the speedmaster as I was leaving the house because I was running late, but during that incident I already knew I was late so the speedmaster was not needed to confirm my data I gathered from the look of my boss' face.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
jshepard is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 1 July 2016, 11:19 PM   #42
The Libertine
Banned
 
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Excellent accuracy Mr P but wouldn't you rather have it +......

'Cos the train has left the station....
The Libertine is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2016, 01:44 AM   #43
mailman
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
 
mailman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,509
Quote:
Originally Posted by directioneng View Post
Excellent accuracy Mr P but wouldn't you rather have it +......

'Cos the train has left the station....
I take the bus It's always late
__________________
JJ
mailman is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 2 July 2016, 05:25 AM   #44
ref1655
Banned
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: SF Bay Area
Watch: 1655/MkI
Posts: 1,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by padi56 View Post
The fact is that no mechanical watch made will keep perfect time, very close yes but perfect no. But please guys to not to anal about a few seconds either way trust me far more important things in daily life.
it's a newbie mentality padi56...a natural preoccupation for those with 5-6 digit references. old-timers & owners of 4 digit models usually can't be bothered. the only time I might 'check' is when re-setting the calendar on months with less than 31 days.
ref1655 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 4 July 2016, 05:31 AM   #45
Jefferyasher
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Ohio
Posts: 361
While my post is not specific to accuracy +/- COSC time, there are a couple of ways I have/am using to measure my 14060m's accuracy. The first is the Microsoft Excel worksheet where you can add starting times and variations to determine accuracy per day/month. The newest, which I recently came across is a website synced to USNO Master Clock. It seems pretty interesting.....will update as time goes on. The website is www.toolwatch.io.
Jefferyasher is online now   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.