ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
21 July 2016, 08:49 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
Thoughts on the 16528 in general
I am itching for a zenith......and i am itching for a nice gold watch. I prefer the 16528 as i can take the bracelet off and have a really nice watch on leather. Is the watch too garish? I am assuming it would not be an every day watch as it would mark too easily.
Would it be considered vintage? What is the collectability of it? I am looking at a later model around the last run or so. I would prefer tritium. I don't think i will be lucky enough to get an inverted six. |
21 July 2016, 09:15 AM | #2 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2008
Real Name: Jay
Location: TEXAS
Watch: Daytona
Posts: 7,648
|
I for one don't consider it vintage.
I do think the Zenith Daytonas are one of the Rolexes with a great upside and will be considered vintage in about 5 to 10 years. |
22 July 2016, 10:44 AM | #3 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: USA Baby!
Posts: 1,068
|
What do s the deliniating feature to be "vintage"? Is it Matt dial or 4 digits? I have a 16800 with a Matt dial which I think is vintage. I guess I look at it like models away from new. The 16800 is before the 116610 and the 16610 so I considered it vintage. With the 16528 it is further from the 116528 and now the ceramic version so it is 2 models away.
Is the gold pretty sturdy or will this watch be worn sparingly? |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.