|
|
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
8 August 2008, 08:38 AM
|
#1 |
|
Banned
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: SteelMan
Location: Somewhere
Posts: 719
|
SEADWELLER: M serial Vs Z and below
ok,
help me understand this: Why does M series command such high prices but Z and below like D & F do not? Is there anything technically different in M than in older versions? Or Is the hoopla merely from the "last manufactured letter" ? thnx |
|
|
|
8 August 2008, 08:42 AM
|
#2 |
|
TRF Moderator & 2024 SubLV41 Patron
Join Date: May 2007
Real Name: Larry
Location: Mojave Desert
Watch: GMT's
Posts: 43,490
|
There is no difference on a Seadweller probably since 2001 or so.
I would say since the Y model forward... Is that about right SD followers..? 
__________________
(Chill ... It's just a watch Forum.....) NAWCC Member |
|
|
|
|
8 August 2008, 08:48 AM
|
#3 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2006
Real Name: Scott
Location: GMT -7
Watch: GMT's & Sub's
Posts: 10,401
|
The "M" is possibly the last serial for the SD, hence more collectable...a little BS IMO!
The last change in the SD occured in mid Y serial (2003) when Rolex went to the no hole lugs. The 16600 always had SEL. ~Scott |
|
|
|
|
8 August 2008, 09:40 AM
|
#4 |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Real Name: Sean
Location: West Florida
Posts: 2,671
|
They are identical. The M is newer and will command more money.
If you were going to buy a car and you found 2 of the same model and they were in the same condition and for the same price, would you buy the 2008 or the 2006? Sean
__________________
"Life is frittered away with detail... simplify, simplify!" Henry D. Thoreau |
|
|
|
|
8 August 2008, 09:41 AM
|
#5 | |
|
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 22,683
|
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
 |
| Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.
Linear Mode
