Opinions on Tudor 7928 Shield Dial

[htbilgic]

Hi everyone,

Could you please let me know what do you think about this shield dial? It's supposed to be for 390 movement, Tudor 7928. However, all of the shield dials (that I have seen) usually have "Oyster Prince" under the shield, not just "Oyster."

Also, the color of "200M = 660FT" is different than that of the "Submariner." To me, this one looks like a re-dial. But I would love to hear what you think.

Thanks!

[Old Expat Beast]

Definitely a redial. The only Tudor sub that was not automatic (i.e. no Prince on the dial) was the mid 1950s 7923.

[htbilgic]

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

Definitely a redial. The only Tudor sub that was not automatic (i.e. no Prince on the dial) was the mid 1950s 7923.

Thank you!

[crowncollection]

Redone


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

[htbilgic]

Originally Posted by crowncollection

Redone


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

Thanks!

[htbilgic]

I've seen a single watch so far with the same dial ("Oyster" under "Tudor") and 4-lines at the bottom of the dial:
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/ROLEX-TUDO...p2047675.l2557

Probably a coincide with the re-dials. I just wanted to show it here.

[htbilgic]

Hmm, and there's one 7922 with similar design:
http://www.imgrum.net/media/12957383...78676_26350368

I wonder if this could be one of the early transitional service dials (it's probably wishful thinking). Even if just "Oyster" is fine, the color difference in the 4 lines seems weird.

[ncstate1201]

Also based on the tudor subs I have owned it appears as though the spacing between 200m=660ft is all wrong. In reality there really isn't much space between the m = and 6...

[htbilgic]

Originally Posted by ncstate1201

Also based on the tudor subs I have owned it appears as though the spacing between 200m=660ft is all wrong. In reality there really isn't much space between the m = and 6...

Yes, you're right. Good point! I passed on this dial.