ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
5 May 2017, 11:24 AM | #1 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Canada
Watch: 124060
Posts: 402
|
Sub-C on Small Wrist
I am absolutely in love with the Sub-C but my wrist is only 6.25 inches and I am really worried about how well it will fit. I'm not so much worried about the watch itself on the top of my wrist, but rather I am worried about the large glidelock clasp taking up too much of the bottom of my wrist. If any Sub-C owners with small wrists could comment with their wrist size, opinion of how well their Sub fits, and if possible provide pictures of the clasp under their wrist, I would be greatly appreciative!
|
5 May 2017, 11:31 AM | #2 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Cave
Watch: Sundial
Posts: 33,940
|
I wear one on my 6.5" wrist with no issues. Maybe try it on a rubber or NATO strap?
|
5 May 2017, 11:35 AM | #3 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Location: San Diego, CA
Posts: 12,437
|
|
5 May 2017, 11:35 AM | #4 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Ed
Location: SoCal
Watch: ugiveiswatchuget
Posts: 9,051
|
To OP, I think we have similar size wrists and here's a pic of LVc glidelock on my wrist.
and of course, Sub ND. |
5 May 2017, 12:03 PM | #5 |
Banned
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Kuala Lumpur , Ma
Posts: 2,011
|
Dont Laugh That's really a 158.75 mm / 6.25 inch wrist fitted with a Sub LV !
See It's all about the presentation ! With limb sleeve Tattoos , Our friend here looks like he can pull it off wearing an even larger sized watch Wear 'em all ! |
5 May 2017, 12:14 PM | #6 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: USA
Posts: 19,706
|
Sub-C on Small Wrist
[QUOTE=meganfox17;7579911]Dont Laugh That's really a 158.75 mm / 6.25 inch wrist fitted with a Sub LV !
See It's all about the presentation ! With limb sleeve Tattoos , Our friend here looks like he can pull it off wearing an even larger sized watch Wear 'em all ! The guy with the tats and Sub used to post at WUS and TRF many moons ago... |
5 May 2017, 12:36 PM | #7 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2009
Location: Montreal, QC
Posts: 1,256
|
Quote:
My wrist is 6.8" (not far off from yours) and the SubC is perfect. Mind you 40mm is a well rounded size case on any wrist size! Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
AP Royal Oak [15400ST.01] Rolex DateJust 41 [126334] Rolex Submariner Date [116610LV] Rolex GMT Master II [116710BLNR] Rolex Cosmograph Daytona [116500LN] |
|
5 May 2017, 12:48 PM | #8 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: USA
Posts: 6,246
|
It's a touch big on top (glidelock is fine)... you get used to it, though 5 digits def a better fit at this wrist size IMHO
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro |
5 May 2017, 12:53 PM | #9 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: N California
Posts: 909
|
I wore a SubC on my 6.25 inch wrist with no problem. I no longer own the watch but my notes say I removed 5 full links and moved the half-link from the 12 o'clock side to the 6 o'clock side. The clasp was not too long for my wrist and, after a few adjustments, was perfectly centered on my 6.25 inch wrist. My notes also say, when the watch was fastened on my wrist, that there were 3.5 links showing on the 6 o'clock side and 4 links showing on the 12 o'clock side. I found the SubC to be very comfortable. I can't say whether it would fit as well on your wrist shape as it did on mine. BTW, I sold my SubC to partially fund another purchase and I now regret parting with it. I will probably buy another SubC.
|
5 May 2017, 01:18 PM | #10 |
2024 ROLEX SUBMARINER 41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2012
Real Name: Lee
Location: 42.48.45N70.48.48
Watch: Too many to list!
Posts: 33,671
|
|
5 May 2017, 02:13 PM | #11 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Real Name: Dennis
Location: Bay Area - 925
Posts: 40,018
|
I wear a Hulk on my 6.5 Inch wrist.
Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk
__________________
TRF Member #6699 (since September 2007) |
5 May 2017, 02:31 PM | #12 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2016
Real Name: Anthony
Location: Florida
Watch: LVc | SubC
Posts: 2,285
|
|
5 May 2017, 11:11 PM | #13 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Rhode Island
Posts: 63
|
You'll be fine. Here's my 114060 on my small, ~6.25" wrist.
The Glidelock is comfy and it's great to be able to make quick adjustments in the summer. |
6 May 2017, 01:18 AM | #14 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2016
Real Name: yusri
Location: Osaka & Malaysia
Watch: Sub n speed pro
Posts: 81
|
6.3 inch wrist here
|
6 May 2017, 03:45 AM | #15 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Dec 2016
Real Name: Greg
Location: SO CA
Watch: Subs
Posts: 312
|
You'll love it as it such a classic. (I have both the 16610 and Sub C, and both fit perfectly with no clasp size issues).
|
6 May 2017, 03:58 AM | #16 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Maryland
Posts: 65
|
Might only be me but the only reason why I hate wearing my sub is the thickness of the watch+bracelet. I realized that the oyster bracelet make the watch larger than it is, even on a 39OP. In the process of changing straps for the sub. Only watch I wear on a bracelet is a 36 DJ.
|
6 May 2017, 04:12 AM | #17 |
Banned
Join Date: May 2014
Real Name: Mike
Location: BOS
Watch: 16710;14060;214270
Posts: 6,375
|
It is not just the wrist size, but what these pictures illustrate is how the wrist SHAPE also impacts the fit.
|
6 May 2017, 04:12 AM | #18 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2014
Real Name: Me & Papa
Location: Echo
Watch: ing TRF
Posts: 3,428
|
Your wrist should be fine with SubC.
|
6 May 2017, 04:33 AM | #19 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2017
Real Name: Geliefd Zijn
Location: Amerika
Watch: Alleen Rolex
Posts: 476
|
shout out to small wrists.
take 2 links out and make the clasp setting the smallest and that's me! were are you in the mix, how many links? |
6 May 2017, 07:20 AM | #20 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2012
Real Name: Ken
Location: WI
Watch: several
Posts: 1,639
|
I am the same. Thinking about taking out one more so the Glidelock has plus and minus adjustment but not certain I need to do that.
__________________
I have far too many expensive hobbies to even consider another one. |
6 May 2017, 07:27 AM | #21 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
I have a larger 7.5+ wrist, so can't help there, but say go give it (the Sub) a try in person. The Glidelock is surprisingly flexible and may be the best fit if you are ok with the wider lugs. Good luck and post pics if you pick up!
|
6 May 2017, 07:30 AM | #22 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2010
Real Name: Neil
Location: UK
Watch: ing ships roll in
Posts: 59,368
|
If your wrist is quite flat you should be OK.
|
6 May 2017, 07:37 AM | #23 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jan 2016
Real Name: Andrew
Location: London
Watch: 116610LV & Ω
Posts: 42
|
I've got the same size wrist and moved a half link to the 6 o'clock side and the fit is perfect.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
6 May 2017, 10:33 AM | #24 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: USA
Watch: Lots
Posts: 4,594
|
Whatever feels right to you
|
6 May 2017, 11:44 AM | #25 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Midwest
Posts: 1,842
|
Quote:
While it doesn't look like a Patek dress watch, it doesn't look like a chunky AP ROO either. It's big enough to look modern but not too big to look silly. I felt that due to the bigger casebackk, it didn't slide underneath my dress shirt cuff as well as my GMT. Forget how big my wrist is- it's something around 6" |
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.