ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
25 February 2014, 09:47 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Here and there
Posts: 12,485
|
stilll 5205 for me
i hate how PP just slammed the movement into a bigger case. the date is in the wrong place as lazy as AP's upsized 15400
__________________
Fine Quality is Long Remembered After the Pain of Spending Money is Forgotten |
25 February 2014, 09:56 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Malaysia
Posts: 91
|
This possibly would be the highest margin model for Patek!
__________________
A Lange & Sohne Langematik Perpetual / Audemars Piguet ROO Rubberclad Black dial / Audemars Piguet Royal Oak 15300 / Vacheron Constantin Malte Grand Classiq / Rolex Datejust / JLC Reverso Day n Nite |
25 February 2014, 10:18 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: Ben
Location: SIN & JKT
Watch: Rolex, AP, PP
Posts: 9,874
|
It's a very elegant watch. But also a bit too simple for me. I will prefer the 5296 sector dial.
|
26 February 2014, 08:16 AM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 1,120
|
Quote:
Yes
__________________
newb watch collector |
|
28 February 2014, 02:52 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: U.S
Watch: Rolex, PP, AP, GS
Posts: 5,785
|
I seen it in person...tried it on...very nice but pricey...I 'll add a little more and get an annual calendar.
|
3 April 2014, 06:43 AM | #36 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,250
|
5227. Yellow gold. Best watch ever made.
|
3 April 2014, 06:45 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: UK
Posts: 2,250
|
5227. Best watch ever made.
|
9 September 2014, 08:30 AM | #38 |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 292
|
Can someone elaborate on this ? Not sure I understand the comment "date is in the wrong place." As opposed to where exactly ? The date window looks appropriately placed as far as I can tell.
|
9 September 2014, 12:33 PM | #39 |
2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: USA
Watch: addiction issues
Posts: 37,328
|
The date is slightly left of where it was on models where the movement was designed to fit the case. For example, the AP 15400 has the movement designed for the 15300 case, and thus the date window is further left on the dial. ALS for example makes a new movement to fit each case size, which is costly but admirable.
|
9 September 2014, 01:05 PM | #40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Not 2 far from u
Posts: 3,457
|
Think I read somewhere that the first 500 of the 5227 had the Patek engraving. I have seen several this year but none with engraving.
|
10 September 2014, 09:04 PM | #41 | |
Banned
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Bay Area
Posts: 292
|
Quote:
|
|
7 November 2014, 10:01 PM | #42 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2014
Location: Amsterdam
Posts: 4
|
Quote:
Proper dial design does not depend entirely on movement size. 5127's hands go until the markers, at 37mm: http://smg.photobucket.com/user/rjbr...127j2.jpg.html 5227's hands go until the markers, at 39mm: http://static.squarespace.com/static...ence5227-1.jpg 5296's hands, at 38mm, DO NOT! http://images.europeanwatch.com/images/13/13329-1.jpg Of course they all use the same movement. Q.E.D. |
|
23 February 2018, 06:10 PM | #43 |
Banned
Join Date: Jul 2008
Location: Here, everywhere
Posts: 1,244
|
Patek 5227 WG
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
|
23 February 2018, 06:24 PM | #44 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: cambridge
Posts: 2,340
|
5227
i bought the R model from a grey dealer for a 10 K discount. actually, it is a very very cool piece in my view, which covers the whole range from very dressy to very sporty. however, as pointed out here repeatedly, it is much too expensive for what it is. no idea how TS justifies the price tag....
|
24 February 2018, 04:46 AM | #45 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5711
Posts: 262
|
It wears bigger than 39 mm. An interesting thing to do is to handle and try on a 5227 and a 5327 at the same time. The cases are almost identical except for the back, yet the 5327 looks just perfect, and the 5227 looks large with plenty of empty real estate in the lower half of the dial. Personally, I'd go for the 5227 if it was 37 mm, but I think that it just looks a bit vacuous at 39 mm. I love everything else about the 5227 expect the price, but I could even find myself willing to pay the price if only it were just a little bit smaller (which would permit the date window to be on the outside track in lieu of that tiny baton, as is the case in my 5711) or perhaps if it had small seconds or a moon phase in the bottom half of the dial.
Paying a little bit extra to get a calendar is tempting, but the 5205 is more than just a little bit extra. The calendar to consider would be the 5146. If you're considering a 5205, you should also be considering the 5396 and the 5237, which I consider to be better choices, though its a matter of taste. (Another interesting thing to do is to put the 5227R,J, and G all next to each other. The dial is, in fact, exactly the same colour, but it looks significantly different depending on the colour of the surrounding metal.) |
24 February 2018, 09:11 AM | #46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: Earth
Watch: 5711
Posts: 262
|
Sorry, typo. 5235g, not 5237
|
24 February 2018, 09:38 AM | #47 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2017
Location: Kansas
Posts: 108
|
When shopping a WG dress watch, I tried it. In the end, could not justify dropping double the price of a WG ALS Sax thin.
|
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.