The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 28 June 2018, 05:51 PM   #1
D111s
"TRF" Member
 
D111s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Hampshire UK
Watch: A few
Posts: 452
Radium Dial study 😵

Just spotted this...

http://wornandwound.com/new-study-wa...ialed-watches/
D111s is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 02:27 AM   #2
AJDay
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 88
I’ll take the risk...

AJDay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 03:17 AM   #3
Kingface66
2024 Pledge Member
 
Kingface66's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Location: The Empire State
Watch: Many
Posts: 3,459
Is 2.28 low, high, good, bad, safe, dangerous?
Kingface66 is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 03:53 AM   #4
AJDay
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 88
From this site: http://www.pureearth.org/blog/radiat...-to-chernobyl/

10 μSv – The average radiation you received today
40 μSv – The radiation you receive by taking a flight from New York to L.A.
100 μSv – The radiation you receive during a dental x-ray
800 μSv – Total radiation dose at Three-Mile Island for the duration of the accident
3,000 μSv – Radiation dose from a mammogram
3,600 μSv – Average radiation a US citizen receives in a year from all sources
50,000 μSv – Maximum allowable yearly occupational dose (USA)
100,000 μSv – Lowest yearly dose likely linked to increased cancer risk
2,000,000 μSv – Severe radiation poisoning (sometimes fatal)

If I understand correctly: my watch is 2.28 μSv per hour, so I'm a little more than tripling my radiation exposure on the days that I wear it for 10 hours. But that's still less than if I were flying from NY to LA (which no one thinks about radiation...)

I'm guessing it's also more localized on my watch rather than a larger radiation exposure that may be affecting the whole body at the same time (i.e. flying on the plane)...

I'm certainly no expert, but I feel the risk is worth it.
AJDay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 04:57 AM   #5
Fredrik
2024 Pledge Member
 
Fredrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Sweden
Watch: 1680
Posts: 1,874
Quote:
Originally Posted by AJDay View Post
I'm certainly no expert, but I feel the risk is worth it.
The study discusses the risks of the radon gas that radium decays into. It is far worse than the radiation from the watch.
Fredrik is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 05:53 AM   #6
AJDay
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: NJ
Posts: 88
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fredrik View Post
The study discusses the risks of the radon gas that radium decays into. It is far worse than the radiation from the watch.
I think there's another recent thread on this with a Hodinkee article that specifies that it was in a poorly-ventilated room:

https://www.rolexforums.com/showthread.php?p=8718442

https://www.hodinkee.com/articles/ne...serious-danger

I was really just looking for another excuse to post a pic of my GMT... :)
AJDay is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 29 June 2018, 06:08 AM   #7
05carbondrz
Banned
 
Join Date: Aug 2015
Location: USA
Posts: 2,030
Anyone want my 2913-8 Radium Seamaster for $100? I can’t be getting radiation poisoning now.
05carbondrz is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.