ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Roller07 · 11 September 2013, 10:37 AM

I would not.

nick c · 11 September 2013, 10:39 AM

Simply no

polarinda · 11 September 2013, 11:09 AM

You mean you guys know what that '20 year old' watch is?

16700 for a gmt blnr with 1k top up? Why not?

polarinda · 11 September 2013, 11:11 AM

I read again the post, got.it now.

No!

polarinda · 11 September 2013, 11:13 AM

I read again the post, got.it now.

No!

Bluesy+ 16700+1k >> lvc or blnr, price wise, pedigree wise.

Onikage · 11 September 2013, 11:17 AM

No way..wait and 1k ontop? Ah that's crazy.

Erok · 11 September 2013, 11:22 AM

Nope, but the GMT ii black and blue is dope. Haaahahahaha !

mjclark32 · 11 September 2013, 11:22 AM

I wouldn't

watchwatcher · 11 September 2013, 11:51 AM

No, don't think so.

Bobcat09 · 11 September 2013, 12:10 PM

No

Hairdude1 · 11 September 2013, 12:22 PM

Never

YoyoGift8 · 11 September 2013, 02:42 PM

Absolutely no.

CWIN · 11 September 2013, 02:47 PM

No way.

A.Sharp · 11 September 2013, 02:48 PM

SELL BOTH PRIVATELY, then buy a brand new hulk, and keep the change!

11 September 2013, 11:17 AM	#36
Onikage "TRF" Member Join Date: Feb 2011 Location: England Watch: 16710, 16628 Posts: 7,757	No way..wait and 1k ontop? Ah that's crazy. __________________ GMT II 16710 TRADITIONAL ( D- Serial #) ROLEXFANBOY P-Club Member #4

11 September 2013, 11:22 AM	#38
mjclark32 "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2010 Real Name: MJC Location: PHL USA Watch: IWC, Rolex, AP Posts: 29,232	I wouldn't __________________

11 September 2013, 02:47 PM	#43
CWIN "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2013 Real Name: Chris Location: San Diego Watch: Patek, AP, Rolex Posts: 4,449	No way. __________________ *Instagram* @cwin

11 September 2013, 02:48 PM	#44
A.Sharp "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2012 Location: New York City Posts: 2,062	SELL BOTH PRIVATELY, then buy a brand new hulk, and keep the change! __________________ A.Sharp "I can't listen to that much Wagner, ya know? I start to get the urge to conquer Poland."

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

11 September 2013, 10:37 AM	#31
Roller07 "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2012 Location: GMT -5 Watch: HulkPepsiCoke Posts: 2,364	I would not.

11 September 2013, 10:39 AM	#32
nick c Banned Join Date: Feb 2012 Location: Canada Posts: 26,846	Simply no

11 September 2013, 11:09 AM	#33
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	You mean you guys know what that '20 year old' watch is? 16700 for a gmt blnr with 1k top up? Why not?

11 September 2013, 11:11 AM	#34
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	I read again the post, got.it now. No!

11 September 2013, 11:13 AM	#35
polarinda "TRF" Member Join Date: Mar 2011 Real Name: Trav Location: singapore Watch: it Posts: 2,316	I read again the post, got.it now. No! Bluesy+ 16700+1k >> lvc or blnr, price wise, pedigree wise.

11 September 2013, 11:22 AM	#37
Erok Member Join Date: Sep 2013 Location: Illinois Posts: 51	Nope, but the GMT ii black and blue is dope. Haaahahahaha !

11 September 2013, 11:51 AM	#39
watchwatcher "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2009 Real Name: Larry Location: Kentucky Watch: Yes Posts: 34,996	No, don't think so.

11 September 2013, 12:10 PM	#40
Bobcat09 "TRF" Member Join Date: Aug 2013 Real Name: Bob Location: Alabama Posts: 192	No

11 September 2013, 12:22 PM	#41
Hairdude1 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Real Name: Alex Location: Chicago Watch: AP,PP, Rolex Posts: 37,156	Never

11 September 2013, 02:42 PM	#42
YoyoGift8 2024 SubLV41 Pledge Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: MNL/Henderson NV Watch: Rolex Posts: 967	Absolutely no.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)