ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
9 April 2008, 03:53 PM | #31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Jacky
Location: Watch World
Posts: 244
|
I am a victim of his and I have all the proof in emails and payment that I had made. It is too long to forward them here. You can email me and I can forward them to you.
|
9 April 2008, 04:08 PM | #32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Jacky
Location: Watch World
Posts: 244
|
Ok if any one still in doubt and our "friend" panic and defended himself, why not those who does not believe, try to go ahead to buy his 16613 P series for $3400? If the buyer gets the watch, I volunteer to buy it over for the same price from the buyer!
|
9 April 2008, 04:34 PM | #33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: Melbourne, AU
Watch: Pepsi
Posts: 4,370
|
Please, just let the mods do what they need to do. They are the people entrusted to maintain this forum and they will do the required to keep up the integrity of this place. So, pm the mods and let them sort it out, ok?
|
9 April 2008, 07:52 PM | #34 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Oct 2006
Real Name: Jacky
Location: Watch World
Posts: 244
|
Quote:
Last edited by watchboy; 9 April 2008 at 07:53 PM.. Reason: TYPO. |
|
9 April 2008, 09:35 PM | #35 |
2024 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Al
Location: Way Up North
Watch: your P's & Q's
Posts: 10,473
|
Then leave it at that.
__________________
Member #1,315 I don't want to get technical, but according to chemistry alcohol IS a solution! |
10 April 2008, 09:11 AM | #36 | |
TRF Moderator & SubLV41 2024 Patron
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: .
Watch: 126610LN
Posts: 35,510
|
Quote:
We appreciate you looking out for everyone here and pasing on the info, but for the time being this thread has run it's course.
__________________
JJ |
|
12 April 2008, 11:32 AM | #37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2006
Real Name: Paul
Location: Wales, UK
Posts: 14,578
|
No1Panerai was asked to provide current pictures of the watch for sale, specifically set to a time of our choice, therefore proving that the watch was in his possession.
This has not occurred, nor has a response been forthcoming after 3 days. One other matter that I won't reveal on this thread also gives me a little cause for concern. There is insufficient evidence to prove that No1Panerai is the scam artist who conned the other member. That needs to be followed through with the authorities by the member concerned. However, when I tot up the infraction points amassed by No1Panerai they add up to a ban. Thread done.
__________________
..33 |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.