The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX


Go Back   Rolex Forums - Rolex Forum > Rolex & Tudor Watch Topics > Rolex General Discussion

Reply
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
Old 20 August 2008, 07:40 AM   #31
DJF881
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: New York
Posts: 248
Holding value well is a relative thing. If you flip watches every six months, selling your M or Z series for 20% off a usual new price seems about right. for a ten year-old watch, even where, as is the case with the sub, there has been no substantial change to the watch, you're really out a lot of money.

Even if you can get, say $2500 back on a watch that cost $4000 in '98, that's not really getting 70% of your money.

Consider your opportunity cost; $4000 invested in 1998 in a fund that averages a 10% annual return on the investment would be $11,412 in 2008.

Of course, depreciation would be much worse on a $4000 stereo or a $4000 television from 1998, but a Rolex still isn't an "investment." Although some enthusiasts consider all old watches "vintage," there are really only a few that are valuable to collectors, and these models are defined by their rarity. Nothing Rolex is making now will be rare in your lifetime.
DJF881 is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.