![]() |
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX
![]() |
#31 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Apr 2009
Real Name: Gerardus
Location: often in the air
Watch: ♕
Posts: 12,200
|
Huge congratz!
__________________
♕126610 ♕126333 ♕116300 |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#32 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
Yeah, for 98% of people it wouldn’t be worth it. For me personally, the only two things I didn’t like about the old one were addressed, making the new one my perfect watch. I had to grab it.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#33 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Real Name: Fu
Location: London
Watch: 124060/126710BLRO
Posts: 313
|
Congratulations. Stunning watch with stunning pictures. I'm yet to try one on but reading these forums, it appears a lot of you have the same opinion on it not wearing any bigger or smaller.. just a slight difference.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#34 | |
Banned
Join Date: Oct 2016
Location: Belgium
Posts: 473
|
Quote:
Then I tried one on. Loved it. Didn't notice any of the above once on the wrist. Looks A LOT more balanced in real life compared to the old one. Wears similar in size, as you also see in the pictures here. Would I prefer it being 1mm smaller? Yes, but I also have smaller wrists. If you have 'regular' sized wrists then it's going to look great on you. |
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#35 |
Banned
Join Date: Jan 2020
Location: US
Posts: 90
|
New sub is more proportioned! I love it!
Sent from my SM-G965U using Tapatalk |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#36 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2006
Real Name: Eddie
Location: Australia
Watch: A few.
Posts: 37,721
|
Call it fat boy one more time and I will hunt you down Davey boy.
__________________
E |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#37 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Mar 2020
Real Name: Gary
Location: London UK
Watch: 116613LB Bluesy
Posts: 1,067
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#38 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2010
Real Name: H
Location: North Carolina
Watch: M99230B-0008
Posts: 5,677
|
Congrats Dave. Great pics.
Since you pointed out the difference in hand size, I can't stop noticing it. One question. The dial and markers seem a tad larger on the 12 series. Is that correct, or just these aging eyes. Stay safe and enjoy your fantastic duo. ![]()
__________________
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#39 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2012
Real Name: Merle
Location: USA
Watch: Rolex
Posts: 2,580
|
Those pictures are sweet! Congrats on your new pickup, they are both fantastic.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#40 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2016
Location: Arlington, TX
Posts: 167
|
Strange, to me the old Blockhead looks bigger.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#41 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Brian (TBone)
Location: canada
Watch: es make me smile
Posts: 79,417
|
Congratulations my friend. You summed it up perfectly.
Great minds ... I gave my 114060 to my wife too ![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#42 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: UK
Posts: 133
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#43 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Sep 2015
Real Name: Richard
Location: GA
Watch: YTBD
Posts: 23,707
|
Thank you for the comparison! Big congrats! Love the all black sub!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#44 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: North Carolina
Watch: Rolex/Others
Posts: 48,511
|
Congratulations.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#45 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: usa
Posts: 19,640
|
Great pics, enjoy. Looks amazing
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#46 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Dec 2012
Real Name: john
Location: San Antonio, TX
Watch: Exp
Posts: 469
|
Very nice, congrats. And the little pocket knife WITH CASE is pretty cool too.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#47 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Aug 2014
Real Name: Francisco
Location: San Juan, PR
Watch: Is Ticking !
Posts: 25,323
|
Congrats
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk Pro
__________________
Francisco ♛ 16610 / 116264 Ω 168.022 / 215.30.40.20.03.002 / 210.90.42.20.01.001 Zenith 02.480.405 2FA security enabled |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#48 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2017
Location: Beach
Watch: Submariner / GMT
Posts: 511
|
Congrats! Great pics and concur completely with your comments on 11 vs 12.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#49 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2009
Real Name: Travis
Location: FL / NYC
Watch: Yes..
Posts: 33,770
|
Congrats on the pic up and nice pics!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#50 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Jul 2013
Real Name: Mike
Location: Downy Ocean Hon
Watch: my money leaving!
Posts: 13,975
|
Best side-by-side comparison pic I have seen so far. Both look great but they really nailed it with the latest
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#51 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2019
Location: New Lenox, IL
Posts: 85
|
Great watch, waiting patiently for the call from my AD. Hopefully soon!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#52 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Aug 2018
Real Name: Mark
Location: Europe
Watch: BLRO | LV | SkyD
Posts: 1,409
|
Nice, congrats!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#53 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: South Carolina
Watch: SD43 126600
Posts: 73
|
Congratulations !! Having owned the "Fat Boy" 114060, I can honestly say that it wore large for a 40mm ! The dial on the new 124060 sure looks smaller in the photos..probably due to the 22mm lug spacing. It's defiantly more proportionally looking. However, but both are great looking pieces in their own way !!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#54 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#55 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2016
Location: USA
Watch: All Rolex
Posts: 7,024
|
Congrats Dave that's a great watch!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#56 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jul 2019
Location: South Carolina
Watch: SD43 126600
Posts: 73
|
DCheeta....it's not offensive at all
![]() ![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#57 | |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: Jun 2013
Real Name: Dave
Location: NYC
Posts: 7,184
|
Quote:
|
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#58 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: California
Posts: 1,250
|
Thanks for the comparison photos. It’s hard to tell the difference between the two. The new one is still too chunky for my liking. I think they should have slimmed everything down to the 5 digit dimensions. I get it though, no backwards evolution.
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#59 |
2025 Pledge Member
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: AZ, USA
Watch: 116500LN
Posts: 2,031
|
At first glance, it was the 114060 in your picture that looked bigger to me!
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
#60 |
"TRF" Member
Join Date: May 2020
Location: Hillside
Posts: 372
|
41mm does look slightly bigger though compensated by the slightly thinner lugs
|
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests) | |
Thread Tools | |
Display Modes | |
|
|
*Banners
Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.