The Rolex Forums   The Rolex Watch

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Old 15 October 2024, 04:41 AM   #1
ChetBaker
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Location: Europe
Posts: 733
I agree. And I enjoy reading this thread. Despite the market downturn high-end watches still constitute a store of value so value retention and future collectibility is a valid consideration.
ChetBaker is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 01:06 AM   #2
FrançoisCzapek
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Singapore
Watch: Classic Pateks
Posts: 264
I'll add that the forum trolls who keep harping about how watches are not an investment miss the point that many aspiring, newer collectors are not wondering about resale value. They are thinking about a good entry point.

In the context of this thread, perhaps someone might opt for a steel Nautilus that they think the market has temporarily underpriced. They would want to understand if this is possible, or if certain models really are less desirable and it has been proven over several years.
FrançoisCzapek is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 01:21 AM   #3
HMHM
"TRF" Member
 
HMHM's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2019
Real Name: HM
Location: 🇲🇾
Posts: 2,474
The truth is that watches can be worth X amount more than what someone paid for, especially at MSRP. There is no denying that is a fact. BUT!! The path to get to that point is incredibly expensive, that by the time you do the maths, it is no longer THAT profitable anymore. Hence the common saying that buy what you like to wear, and the monetary gains will be the additional bonus.

Take the LM Daytona 126529 for example. The spend history to get that watch from the AD is insanely high, and most ADs get only 1, at max 2. Some do not even get them at all
So this piece tends to go to really important customers that the AD cant lose. If you add up all their purchases, including the less sought after pieces, the profit margin is no longer as "attractive" that people make it seem to be.

The same applies for the Nautilus. Reasonably, no one is getting a steel Nautilus as a first piece, unless you are someone of importance to the society like a Prime Minister etc. By the time you qualify for one, you are at best breaking even. From grey market it's even worse! The figures speak for themselves.Just look where prices are today compared to 2022. So your idea about entry point for newer collector is a simple question - how much losses is one willing to take in an uncertain market if they plan to buy from greys? If they are fine with losing money from the very beginning, this conversation is moot.
HMHM is offline   Reply With Quote
Old 18 October 2024, 02:15 AM   #4
FrançoisCzapek
"TRF" Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2022
Location: Singapore
Watch: Classic Pateks
Posts: 264
This presumes that every newer collector is looking for a Nautilus or Daytona.

An odd assumption.
FrançoisCzapek is offline   Reply With Quote
Reply


Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump

My Watch LLC

OCWatches

Asset Appeal

Wrist Aficionado

DavidSW Watches

Takuya Watches


*Banners Of The Month*
This space is provided to horological resources.





Copyright ©2004-2024, The Rolex Forums. All Rights Reserved.

ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Rolex is a registered trademark of ROLEX USA. The Rolex Forums is not affiliated with ROLEX USA in any way.