ROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEXROLEX

Roselló · 17 February 2015, 01:30 AM

I would....... The DJ II you described is a beauty!!! Never been fan of the fat lugs. Never will.

Mastergreenhand · 17 February 2015, 01:55 AM

Best to have both if you really want the other. Save up and give it time.

stil · 17 February 2015, 09:40 AM

You need both....

mattcantwin · 17 February 2015, 11:40 AM

I had this...

Traded it for this...

Then I went through a "panic attack" and sold off several watches to bank some money, including the DJ II.

After a while, I calmed down and decided to add a Rolex back into the mix...

I am happy to say I currently have my favorite of the three.

Danex · 17 February 2015, 11:47 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drakulie

Also, in my opinion there is no such thing as a Sub "no date". There is a Sub/Submariner or a Sub/Submariner Date.

I agree with this. Please people!

Gryfalcon · 17 February 2015, 11:54 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by hdms

x2

c on owning such a great watch :) be happy!

997.2 · 17 February 2015, 01:17 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by watchabout

I'm not ashamed to ask:
What is SubC as opposed to Sub?

subC is 114060

sub non ceramic (C) is 14060/14060M

997.2 · 17 February 2015, 01:18 PM

and no do NOT do the trade

slashd0t · 17 February 2015, 01:25 PM

The NDSubC is one of the greatest watches Rolex has ever made... So much so, when I chose a 10 year anniversary watch with a much larger budget, I chose the NDSubC because I knew it would still love it 20, 30, 40 years from now ..

darwin95 · 17 February 2015, 01:34 PM

Quote:

Originally Posted by Old Expat Beast

Sure, if you prefer one over the other. Go with your heart....really doesn't matter what anyone else would do. It's not a major life decision.

can't agree more. It's your personal watch decision. You should go with your heart.. not somebody's opinion. like someone just said here, you will have chance to reverse it if/when you want to..

a4b5 · 17 February 2015, 01:37 PM

No. I'm afraid you'll regret it later if you do it

watchabout · 17 February 2015, 02:16 PM

Thanks melons

Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

jdcross · 27 February 2015, 12:12 AM

I bought the DJII blue sticks for a special milestone. While it is a truly impressive and outstanding watch, it lacked ruggedness and versatility. I ended up buying a SubC to complete the collection a year later and would recommend the same as it rounds off a simple collection. If I had to chose one, I would keep the SubC.

amador · 27 February 2015, 01:00 AM

I wouldnt, my 0.02$ save up for the DJII and definately keep your sub

Jack T · 27 February 2015, 01:05 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by drakulie

No.

Also, in my opinion there is no such thing as a Sub "no date". There is a Sub/Submariner or a Sub/Submariner Date.

I don't think it's a matter of opinion. They are Rolex's official names for the two watches, as well.

And no, I would not trade my Sub for a DJ II

yahoo_mks · 27 February 2015, 01:21 AM

Quote:

Originally Posted by stil

You need both....

+1 - I started with the DJII and after 2 years of saving and "deciding" between Sub, GMTc II and GMTII ended up with a 40mm ExpII. If I had started on the sport side as you did, would have ended up with a DJII at some point...

Good luck!

17 February 2015, 01:30 AM	#61
Roselló "TRF" Member Join Date: May 2008 Location: SA, Texas. Watch: * { SD & DJ } * Posts: 943	I would....... The DJ II you described is a beauty!!! Never been fan of the fat lugs. Never will. __________________ ......... All In.

17 February 2015, 01:55 AM	#62
Mastergreenhand "TRF" Member Join Date: Jun 2012 Real Name: Tony Location: Chi-town Watch: Starbucks, Panerai Posts: 1,186	Best to have both if you really want the other. Save up and give it time. __________________ Starbucks, Speedmaster Professional, PAM 212

17 February 2015, 01:25 PM	#69
slashd0t "TRF" Member Join Date: Jul 2011 Real Name: Jamie Location: Edmonton, AB Watch: This & That Posts: 771	The NDSubC is one of the greatest watches Rolex has ever made... So much so, when I chose a 10 year anniversary watch with a much larger budget, I chose the NDSubC because I knew it would still love it 20, 30, 40 years from now .. __________________ /.

27 February 2015, 01:00 AM	#74
amador "TRF" Member Join Date: Sep 2011 Real Name: Rene Location: Maryland,USA Watch: Bluesy SubC & DSSD Posts: 304	I wouldnt, my 0.02$ save up for the DJII and definately keep your sub __________________ ROLEX 216570 EXPLORER II(Black Dial) ROLEX 116660 D-BLUE DSSD ROLEX 16623 TT YACHTMASTER(WIFE) BREITLING SUPEROCEAN CHRONO

Thread Tools
Show Printable Version Email this Page
Display Modes
Linear Mode Switch to Hybrid Mode Switch to Threaded Mode

17 February 2015, 09:40 AM	#63
stil Member Join Date: Jul 2014 Real Name: not stil Location: USA Watch: Rolex n Omega Posts: 1,327	You need both....

17 February 2015, 11:40 AM	#64
mattcantwin "TRF" Member Join Date: Nov 2010 Location: NY Posts: 453	I had this... Traded it for this... Then I went through a "panic attack" and sold off several watches to bank some money, including the DJ II. After a while, I calmed down and decided to add a Rolex back into the mix... I am happy to say I currently have my favorite of the three.

17 February 2015, 01:18 PM	#68
997.2 Banned Join Date: Jul 2013 Real Name: Chaz Location: Cherry Hill, NJ Posts: 2,721	and no do NOT do the trade

17 February 2015, 01:37 PM	#71
a4b5 "TRF" Member Join Date: Apr 2012 Location: Indonesia Watch: 116234 Posts: 33	No. I'm afraid you'll regret it later if you do it

17 February 2015, 02:16 PM	#72
watchabout "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2015 Real Name: Dave Location: miami Watch: Submariner Posts: 374	Thanks melons Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk

27 February 2015, 12:12 AM	#73
jdcross "TRF" Member Join Date: Jan 2012 Location: Singapore Posts: 17	I bought the DJII blue sticks for a special milestone. While it is a truly impressive and outstanding watch, it lacked ruggedness and versatility. I ended up buying a SubC to complete the collection a year later and would recommend the same as it rounds off a simple collection. If I had to chose one, I would keep the SubC.

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)